You mean Karl Rove?
Posted on 10/22/2020 4:32:04 AM PDT by SmokingJoe
Nothing draws attention to an issue than a massive attempt to cover it up. If they continue to mute him, he can tell the viewers that he’ll put something out to ask questions and get information out.
I thought I read that the techies shutting out this story caused it to actually get twice the exposure.
Biden needs to be allowed to ramble.
Biden doesn’t have two minutes of mental power.
You mean Karl Rove?
NO, don’t pull out, just go ahead and talk about it anyway!
It wold be a huge mistake to underestimate Donald Trump....he’s got more game winning moves than Michael Jackson Jordan ever had.
Heh...I like it.
Yup - keep bringing it up. The left will look panicked and crazy by continually trying to shut it down. Keep questioning....why doesn’t Joe want to talk about money from China? Why isn’t this subject being allowed? What is being covered up? What is the vp afraid of? Americans want these questions answered.....why are you blocking them?
He should just send over a cardboard cut-out of himself and say they can go ahead and hurl accusations and invective at it while not allowing him to rebut because that’s what these “debates” amount to.
Well, after I thought about it I think you’re right. The only exception is that every time Trump is given a chance to speak he should bring up Biden again and again. It would send a message to the American people watching them keep cutting off his mic every time he tries to talk.
Yup... and this could just be Part 2 of a well laid trap to expose not just the Biden crime family but the enemedia. The first part part of exposure being the Leslie Stahl interview and I don't think the timing of that interview was accidental.....you would think that by now, the media would know something about potential blowback but in their eagerness, they'll be happy to be the 'fools rush in" crowd.
I like it.
This points out that the debate commission is packed with democratic simpathetic people. How then, can a Republican candidate get a fair shake? People watch a dabate for all aspects of a person’s character. That is an indication of who they are and how they would act as president. To ban questions to one of the candidates, you actually nullify the debate. If I was Donald Trump, I would back out and state that reason. It would cast a cloud on the debate commission and Joe Biden would therefore be incriminated.
Why would this rule change prevent Trump from talking about foreign policy? I thought one of the categories was “leadership” - one can easily fit anything into that box.
If they shut President Trump down for talking about the Biden scandal, it’s just going to reaffirm what many already know about the media and it’s processes. I suspect the anger will drive many more (fence-sitters) to the polls.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.