[Pravious]

... and that’s not illegal?

Imagine if some company charged blacks 45% more for something because they were black.

[D Rider]

And that will stop them from stealing? I don’t get it.

[libertylover]

Imagine if some company charged blacks 45% more for something because they were black.

Many times it's easy to see if something is right or wrong by turning it around as you point out here.

[17th Miss Regt]

Maybe if they charged blacks only 3/5 of the regular price ....

[itsahoot]

Imagine if some company charged blacks 45% more for something because they were black.

Well technically they are charging whites 45% more aren't they?

[imardmd1]

. . . a 45% discount for Black customers.

Wrong. That's a $45/#55 x 100 = 81.8% surcharge to the White customer.

(Incidentally, if the journalists are going to capitalize the adjective to make it a proper noun, then they must do the same for "White".)

[jimfree]

Remembering various other businesses that surrendered profitability to wokeness.

[Persevero]

It is illegal. Whites or Asians or Jews etc should sue.

[PUGACHEV]

That’s 10% has to come from somewhere, and it sure as hell isn’t comming out of their profits. So, it must be passed on to their Asaian and White customers - sort of penalty for their race. Sure, that sounds legal.