Excellent!!!
Good news.
Trump is showing the world precisely why you fill judicial vacancies quickly and with qualified appointments.
I’m no fan of this chief justice and my comments should in no way reflect positively on him, outside of this particular ruling.
State election laws are being protected by the courts.
Another Obama judge whose not an Obama judge.
There will be judges fudging the law on ballots, closing times, counting deadlines all over the country. This is why the Supremes need 9 justices.
The SC will be needed badly in the next few months to block the Rats’ cheating attempts and a 4-4 court is a bad idea.
Fourth Circuit ain’t the bastion of Constitutionalism it used to be. (Unless President Trump has changed it.)
Roberts!!!
Wow! this is a GIGANTIC win for honest elections and the rule of law and sets a powerful precedent!
South Carolina Ping 
If you'd like to be on or off the South Carolina ping list, just click Private Reply below and drop me a FReepmail.
Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s revenge, gotta love it.
Ronna McDaniel@GOPChairwoman· The Supreme Court just handed Republicans and the voters of South Carolina a huge victory for election integrity! Democrats had sued the state to strip away an important safeguard for absentee voting, but the Court ruled against them with no Justices issuing dissents.
(1/3)
Ronna McDaniel@GOPChairwoman· This win follows Republicans’ victory in the lower courts, where Democrats’ lost in their attempts to extend the state’s Election Day delivery deadline and eliminate the state’s ban on ballot harvesting.
(2/3)
Ronna McDaniel@GOPChairwoman· This is the SIXTH win for Republicans in roughly the last week following major victories in Iowa, Ohio, Maine, New Hampshire and Arizona. The RNC will not stop fighting to http://ProtectTheVote.com
(3/3)
It’s like I’ve said before...the Supreme Court decision in Bush vs. Gore (2000) says that Judges cannot write election law. That’s the job of the State Legislatures. You’d think these Judges would do some research before making a ruling that will make them look like the asses they are.
The PA Supreme Court and a trial court in Michigan did something analogous, if not the same, as this SC Court tried to do. I wonder if this case has implications for those decisions?
The Dems are going to freak out. Just think how many ballots they wasted by sending them in without having to fake a signature!
It’s not the place of the judiciary to be writing or rewriting laws.
She has way over stepped her bounds and needs to be censured.
No one person should have that much power to circumvent our legal system and impose their will on everyone else. They were not appointed as demagogues.
Yes, this is going to get real interesting over the next few weeks.
Yet another example of a criminal, democrat judge executing lawfare against the people of the United Stqtes.
JoMa