Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING: Joe Biden’s Campaign Requests Breaks EVERY 30 MINUTES during Tonight’s First Debate — VIDEO
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com ^ | 09.29.2020 | Jim Hoft

Posted on 09/29/2020 8:23:06 AM PDT by rxsid

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-242 next last
To: kenmcg
Give him one break halfway through if he agrees to drug test and ear piece exam.

No. Nothing.

221 posted on 09/29/2020 10:53:21 AM PDT by politicket (Don't remove a Bernie Sanders bumper sticker. It's the only thing holding the car together!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

Enough time for Mama Jill to take him to the restroom, pull down that little plastic bench thingie, and change his diapers.


222 posted on 09/29/2020 10:55:01 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam (Disappointment is inevitable. Discouragement is a choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

Some one needs to put a stop watch on his last Ten speech’s, and determine the average time of a speech. I would guess they are around 20 minutes per speech. Maybe something could be made of this.


223 posted on 09/29/2020 10:57:10 AM PDT by political1 (Love your neighbors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear

Foley catheter and a leg bag. Concealing his cognitive issue will be more of a problem.


224 posted on 09/29/2020 11:00:48 AM PDT by DrHFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

Joe is asleep right now,is having his cicadia rhythm adjusted so he thinks its 9 in the morning,not 9 at night,that’s what he has been doing for weeks


225 posted on 09/29/2020 11:01:16 AM PDT by ballplayer (By)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

What about every 3 minutes?

Questions can be asked then Biden can consult with his team for 3 minutes... then come back for another 3 minute answer on stage, then another break... ... rinse and repeat...


226 posted on 09/29/2020 11:05:36 AM PDT by GOPJ (If the first debate question is about Hunter Biden it means Democrats have the questions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redwood71
You wouldn’t have to. In the 1.5 hour process, there are always breaks for commercials.

There will be no commercials. It's straight through...

227 posted on 09/29/2020 11:09:50 AM PDT by politicket (Don't remove a Bernie Sanders bumper sticker. It's the only thing holding the car together!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: rxsid
Biden’s request for breaks and his refusal for drug testing and ear receiver checks give Trump more latitude to contrast his fitness for office with Biden’s. Joe's avoidance of the press and the public are also great targets and should be alluded to in the debate. But nothing will succeed like a thorough trouncing of Biden’s positions on the COVID19 response and a thorough description of his complicit past in an administration that harmed the economy and weakened national security. His son's influence peddling is also very problematic for Joe and should be thoroughly addressed tonight.

Tonight's debate is quite possibly the only time Trump will be face to face with Biden prior the election. Trump has to strike effectively.

228 posted on 09/29/2020 11:11:36 AM PDT by PerConPat (A politician is an animal that can sit on a fence and yet keep both ears to the ground--Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

“commercial breaks”

There were breaks in the Trump/Clinton debate in 2015 as it was an issue when Hilary was late getting back to the podium during a five minute commercial break:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2015/12/21/donald-trump-calls-hillary-clinton-disgusting-for-using-the-restroom-during-a-debate/

They may say no, but it has happened before and I do not know why they had them then. We’ll see how they handle it.

rwood


229 posted on 09/29/2020 11:15:08 AM PDT by Redwood71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

Won’t take a drug test, won’t allow anyone to check him for communication devices and now he needs to go back stage several times during a short debate.

Gezzuz...This is becoming a farce.

And the moderator is political hack who’s completely biased!

wow...


230 posted on 09/29/2020 12:48:59 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rllngrk33

Nads drops off a stinky boom-boom and Nancy doesn’t have her mask on! Suck it beyotch!


231 posted on 09/29/2020 1:14:12 PM PDT by bobby.223 (Retired up in the snowy Mountains of the American Redoubt and it's a great life!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: chuckee

LOL!


232 posted on 09/29/2020 1:14:49 PM PDT by nutmeg (Mega prayers for Rush Limbaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rxsid
Every thirty minutes? That's three during a 90-minute debate. Biden's gonna have a sore ass


233 posted on 09/29/2020 1:51:59 PM PDT by P.O.E. (Pray for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PerConPat

“Trump has to strike effectively.”

I watched just enough of it before I turned it off. The whole process was not based on facts, but speculation. Trump allowed himself to get into a name calling contest with Joe so the real success facts of what he’s accomplished were tarnished with innuendoes.

This trick has been used by libs for half a century. I saw this:

Biden got his points in, whether they meant anything or not, and when Trump had his turn Biden broke in on Trump with a useless piece of unproven info and destroyed Trumps efforts to display himself.

Here is how libs work:

They always get their point in.
They make every effort to stop their enemy from getting in theirs.
If they can’t discredit the topic being displayed, they change the subject or cop out with an excuse like “we’re too far apart.”
Shortly after that when the topic can’t be changed or modified, and when they can’t continue on the level provided with a lack of information or just being wrong and knowing it, they will try to discredit the messenger.

Biden did all that...and Wallace let him. So it digressed to a couple of 10 year olds trying to put the color in each other’s mom’s army boots. And in that type of situation, Biden wins. Not because he did anything productive, but because he stopped Trump from doing anything productive either. Trump wins with his record and successes in office. Facts are the gold standard. It never made it to that while I was still able to keep enough of my dinner down to change the channel.

rwood


234 posted on 09/29/2020 10:14:57 PM PDT by Redwood71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: Redwood71
I don't blame you for “channeling” out...It was tough to watch...I agree with your comments regarding facts...Even the skinny kid (Lisa?) on PBS busted Biden on his violent crime “facts.” Most of Biden’s comments were limited to accusations and opinions. Trump made some excellent points, especially on law and order as well as challenging Biden to comment on BLM/Antifa’s terrorist activity. That essentially drew a response that sounded like crickets.
235 posted on 09/29/2020 10:40:51 PM PDT by PerConPat (A politician is an animal that can sit on a fence and yet keep both ears to the ground--Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: PerConPat

“Trump made some excellent points...”

I’m sure he did. But the time I was able to survive the fiasco he never impressed. And this was due to Wallace allowing Biden to just throw any ol’ speculation, name calling, out he wanted whether it meant anything or not.

When you are in a political campaign at this level, there is no Marquess of Queensberry but there are rules set up to create the illusion of intelligence rather than just an argument. Never saw it. And for Trump to win, he has to bury Biden in facts until Joe does have to go to the can. Wallace never allowed it, and it opens up the next one to be even worse as liberal commentators will only have one eye open and it will be on Biden’s side of the stage.

Unfortunate our humanity has reached such a low point of acceptance where we can’t intelligently discuss the best plan of how to improve while being subjected to the worst actions of failure we are fed and consider to be the norm. Trump never got the chance to bury Joe so Joe remains exactly where he was...no where.....but electable. And this was going to be Trump’s best chance as everything from here is a stacked deck....liberal moderators with no conscience, an election process so already proven flawed in it’s basic practice it’s going to be impossible to properly execute honestly, and a liberal machine that has nothing to do with honest elections. And those points do worry me. I wish Trump could have opened up Joe’s throat, as in shoved down, with facts. That’s how Trump is going to win. Make it impossible for Joe to be considered anything viable, even intelligent life...period. And the tools were there.

rwood


236 posted on 09/30/2020 5:53:13 AM PDT by Redwood71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: Redwood71

It was straight out of “Idiocracy”

“But I have a solution.”

“I have a solution...You’re a d@ck! South Carolina, what’s up!”


237 posted on 09/30/2020 5:54:25 AM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]

To: Redwood71
Trump is incapable of separating his really valuable points and insights from his confrontational/territorial instincts. He has accomplished a great deal in his presidency, but hasn't been able to summon the restraint to take advantage of TV's "cool" medium aspects to display his true worth . (Reagan was the master in this regard.) This, coupled with the leftist bias rotting the core of American media, has DJT fighting an uphill battle.

Trump's common sense, outstanding business instincts, patriotism, and respect for law and order and might still be enough to win a second term. However, as much as I admire Trump's fighting spirit, it's the suburban moderate who has to come through on Nov. 3rd., not conservatives like me.

Unfortunate our humanity has reached such a low point of acceptance where we can’t intelligently discuss the best plan...

Amen...IMO, cultures are cyclical, and we are now at a low point where the creative is giving way to the bizarre (Gibbon?).

238 posted on 09/30/2020 7:34:53 AM PDT by PerConPat (A politician is an animal that can sit on a fence and yet keep both ears to the ground--Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]

To: PerConPat

“...TV’s “cool” medium aspects to display his true worth...”

You mentioned Reagan, he was an actor. Trump, he’s a businessman. Reagan was capable of telling the story. Trump is capable, in this instance, of telling the truth....but he didn’t because he wasn’t given the opportunity and he fell into what Biden wanted, nothing accomplished and Biden is still in the ring with no less fires to put out than he had. And if the format had been adhered to, Biden would have come out of that bruised up at the least. But Wallace blew it. Now the second and third can get completely out of hand.

rwood


239 posted on 09/30/2020 9:15:55 AM PDT by Redwood71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]

To: Redwood71

In these debates, if there are more, Trump will never get an even opportunity. He needs to come to grips with that fact and find an approach that blunts the moderator’s bias and simultaneously scores hits on Biden with facts... and, yes, even with humor at times. He’s in those debates to win the middle, or it’s over.


240 posted on 09/30/2020 12:58:06 PM PDT by PerConPat (A politician is an animal that can sit on a fence and yet keep both ears to the ground--Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-242 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson