Posted on 09/29/2020 8:23:06 AM PDT by rxsid
No. Nothing.
Enough time for Mama Jill to take him to the restroom, pull down that little plastic bench thingie, and change his diapers.
Some one needs to put a stop watch on his last Ten speech’s, and determine the average time of a speech. I would guess they are around 20 minutes per speech. Maybe something could be made of this.
Foley catheter and a leg bag. Concealing his cognitive issue will be more of a problem.
Joe is asleep right now,is having his cicadia rhythm adjusted so he thinks its 9 in the morning,not 9 at night,that’s what he has been doing for weeks
What about every 3 minutes?
Questions can be asked then Biden can consult with his team for 3 minutes... then come back for another 3 minute answer on stage, then another break... ... rinse and repeat...
There will be no commercials. It's straight through...
Tonight's debate is quite possibly the only time Trump will be face to face with Biden prior the election. Trump has to strike effectively.
“commercial breaks”
There were breaks in the Trump/Clinton debate in 2015 as it was an issue when Hilary was late getting back to the podium during a five minute commercial break:
They may say no, but it has happened before and I do not know why they had them then. We’ll see how they handle it.
rwood
Won’t take a drug test, won’t allow anyone to check him for communication devices and now he needs to go back stage several times during a short debate.
Gezzuz...This is becoming a farce.
And the moderator is political hack who’s completely biased!
wow...
Nads drops off a stinky boom-boom and Nancy doesn’t have her mask on! Suck it beyotch!
LOL!
“Trump has to strike effectively.”
I watched just enough of it before I turned it off. The whole process was not based on facts, but speculation. Trump allowed himself to get into a name calling contest with Joe so the real success facts of what he’s accomplished were tarnished with innuendoes.
This trick has been used by libs for half a century. I saw this:
Biden got his points in, whether they meant anything or not, and when Trump had his turn Biden broke in on Trump with a useless piece of unproven info and destroyed Trumps efforts to display himself.
Here is how libs work:
They always get their point in.
They make every effort to stop their enemy from getting in theirs.
If they can’t discredit the topic being displayed, they change the subject or cop out with an excuse like “we’re too far apart.”
Shortly after that when the topic can’t be changed or modified, and when they can’t continue on the level provided with a lack of information or just being wrong and knowing it, they will try to discredit the messenger.
Biden did all that...and Wallace let him. So it digressed to a couple of 10 year olds trying to put the color in each other’s mom’s army boots. And in that type of situation, Biden wins. Not because he did anything productive, but because he stopped Trump from doing anything productive either. Trump wins with his record and successes in office. Facts are the gold standard. It never made it to that while I was still able to keep enough of my dinner down to change the channel.
rwood
“Trump made some excellent points...”
I’m sure he did. But the time I was able to survive the fiasco he never impressed. And this was due to Wallace allowing Biden to just throw any ol’ speculation, name calling, out he wanted whether it meant anything or not.
When you are in a political campaign at this level, there is no Marquess of Queensberry but there are rules set up to create the illusion of intelligence rather than just an argument. Never saw it. And for Trump to win, he has to bury Biden in facts until Joe does have to go to the can. Wallace never allowed it, and it opens up the next one to be even worse as liberal commentators will only have one eye open and it will be on Biden’s side of the stage.
Unfortunate our humanity has reached such a low point of acceptance where we can’t intelligently discuss the best plan of how to improve while being subjected to the worst actions of failure we are fed and consider to be the norm. Trump never got the chance to bury Joe so Joe remains exactly where he was...no where.....but electable. And this was going to be Trump’s best chance as everything from here is a stacked deck....liberal moderators with no conscience, an election process so already proven flawed in it’s basic practice it’s going to be impossible to properly execute honestly, and a liberal machine that has nothing to do with honest elections. And those points do worry me. I wish Trump could have opened up Joe’s throat, as in shoved down, with facts. That’s how Trump is going to win. Make it impossible for Joe to be considered anything viable, even intelligent life...period. And the tools were there.
rwood
It was straight out of “Idiocracy”
“But I have a solution.”
“I have a solution...You’re a d@ck! South Carolina, what’s up!”
Trump's common sense, outstanding business instincts, patriotism, and respect for law and order and might still be enough to win a second term. However, as much as I admire Trump's fighting spirit, it's the suburban moderate who has to come through on Nov. 3rd., not conservatives like me.
Unfortunate our humanity has reached such a low point of acceptance where we can’t intelligently discuss the best plan...
Amen...IMO, cultures are cyclical, and we are now at a low point where the creative is giving way to the bizarre (Gibbon?).
“...TV’s “cool” medium aspects to display his true worth...”
You mentioned Reagan, he was an actor. Trump, he’s a businessman. Reagan was capable of telling the story. Trump is capable, in this instance, of telling the truth....but he didn’t because he wasn’t given the opportunity and he fell into what Biden wanted, nothing accomplished and Biden is still in the ring with no less fires to put out than he had. And if the format had been adhered to, Biden would have come out of that bruised up at the least. But Wallace blew it. Now the second and third can get completely out of hand.
rwood
In these debates, if there are more, Trump will never get an even opportunity. He needs to come to grips with that fact and find an approach that blunts the moderator’s bias and simultaneously scores hits on Biden with facts... and, yes, even with humor at times. He’s in those debates to win the middle, or it’s over.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.