“Trump has to strike effectively.”
I watched just enough of it before I turned it off. The whole process was not based on facts, but speculation. Trump allowed himself to get into a name calling contest with Joe so the real success facts of what he’s accomplished were tarnished with innuendoes.
This trick has been used by libs for half a century. I saw this:
Biden got his points in, whether they meant anything or not, and when Trump had his turn Biden broke in on Trump with a useless piece of unproven info and destroyed Trumps efforts to display himself.
Here is how libs work:
They always get their point in.
They make every effort to stop their enemy from getting in theirs.
If they can’t discredit the topic being displayed, they change the subject or cop out with an excuse like “we’re too far apart.”
Shortly after that when the topic can’t be changed or modified, and when they can’t continue on the level provided with a lack of information or just being wrong and knowing it, they will try to discredit the messenger.
Biden did all that...and Wallace let him. So it digressed to a couple of 10 year olds trying to put the color in each other’s mom’s army boots. And in that type of situation, Biden wins. Not because he did anything productive, but because he stopped Trump from doing anything productive either. Trump wins with his record and successes in office. Facts are the gold standard. It never made it to that while I was still able to keep enough of my dinner down to change the channel.
rwood