Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why are liberals angry at Trump for using a tax loophole that was signed into law by Obama?
wordpress ^ | September 28, 2020 | Dan from Squirrel Hill

Posted on 09/28/2020 4:51:41 AM PDT by grundle

Why are liberals angry at Trump for using a tax loophole that was signed into law by Obama?

As a Libertarian, I’m against tax loopholes. I want the tax code to be as simple as possible, and with marginal tax rates as low as possible.

Democrats prefer higher marginal tax rates, so they can claim that they want to “soak the rich.”

But at the same time, these Democrats also favor giving rich people all sorts of loopholes, writeoffs, and deductions, so they don’t actually have to pay those taxes.

And now, liberals are angry at Trump for using a tax loophole that was signed into law by Obama.

The New York Times just reported:

Mr. Trump harvested that refund bonanza by declaring huge business losses — a total of $1.4 billion from his core businesses for 2008 and 2009 — that tax laws had prevented him from using in prior years.

But to turn that long arc of failure into a giant refund check, he relied on some deft accounting footwork and an unwitting gift from an unlikely source — Mr. Obama.

Business losses can work like a tax-avoidance coupon: A dollar lost on one business reduces a dollar of taxable income from elsewhere. The types and amounts of income that can be used in a given year vary, depending on an owner’s tax status. But some losses can be saved for later use, or even used to request a refund on taxes paid in a prior year.

Until 2009, those coupons could be used to wipe away taxes going back only two years. But that November, the window was more than doubled by a little-noticed provision in a bill Mr. Obama signed as part of the Great Recession recovery effort. Now business owners could request full refunds of taxes paid in the prior four years, and 50 percent of those from the year before that.

Mr. Trump had paid no income taxes in 2008. But the change meant that when he filed his taxes for 2009, he could seek a refund of not just the $13.3 million he had paid in 2007, but also the combined $56.9 million paid in 2005 and 2006, when “The Apprentice” created what was likely the biggest income tax bite of his life.

The records reviewed by The Times indicate that Mr. Trump filed for the first of several tranches of his refund several weeks later, in January 2010. That set off what tax professionals refer to as a “quickie refund,” a check processed in 90 days on a tentative basis, pending an audit by the I.R.S.

His total federal income tax refund would eventually grow to $70.1 million, plus $2,733,184 in interest. He also received $21.2 million in state and local refunds, which often piggyback on federal filings.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: breaks; laugh; tax
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: grundle

Because they are hypocrites.


21 posted on 09/28/2020 6:18:46 AM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mountainlion
Wonder how many libretards use these loop holes.

I'd bet all of them.

Half of the people do not pay taxes anyway. This is just trump hate.

Yup, and typical liberal projection.

22 posted on 09/28/2020 6:19:57 AM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: grundle

There is no such thing as a tax “Loophole.” There are only tax laws.


23 posted on 09/28/2020 7:59:27 AM PDT by mfish13 (Elections have Consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: virgil

and his brother’s.


24 posted on 09/28/2020 8:07:16 AM PDT by TwoSue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: grundle

All businesses with losses used this law. Trump’s business weren’t the only ones that used this law, although the NYT wants you to think that he was the sole beneficiary.


25 posted on 09/28/2020 8:17:31 AM PDT by damper99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TokarevM57

I’m sure Gates, Buffett, Bezos and other billionaire Dems used same tax provisions. Like Trump is the only in US that used the legal provisions.

Hope President points out that it was due to Obama that changed the law on look back years.


26 posted on 09/28/2020 8:58:10 AM PDT by Engedi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Pelosi Hair Cut = Tax Loophole


27 posted on 09/28/2020 9:00:49 AM PDT by Vaduz (women and children to be impacIQ of chimpsted the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson