Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/03/2020 7:25:23 AM PDT by raptor22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: raptor22

2 posted on 08/03/2020 7:37:10 AM PDT by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22

By virtue of his non-degree from Harvard. Unless you count the honorary one he bought 2 years ago. Whadda punk.


3 posted on 08/03/2020 7:38:13 AM PDT by bigbob (Trust Trump. Trust the Plan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22

EVIL Face - Words - Deeds. Look, listen, examine. Go hunt Nazi collaborator George $oro$, skidMark.


6 posted on 08/03/2020 8:15:06 AM PDT by PGalt (Past Peak Civilization?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22

“He is to be the sole arbiter of truth and has no respect for constitutional rights like our freedom of speech...”

Zuckerberg is not mentioned in the First Amendment.


8 posted on 08/03/2020 8:28:15 AM PDT by Meatspace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22

“He now says he knows more than board-certified medical doctors about the drug hydroxychloroquine, for example, and will deny you access to what they say, calling their judgments and pronouncement based on their studies and actual experience treating patients as “harmful misinformation. Dr. Zuckerberg has spoken and he will not let us hear a second opinion.”


Dr. Zuckerberg’s company is what is commonly known as a publisher, because it is determining what is, and is not, permitted to be published on its website. With the positive (from FB’s POV) of being able to choose what is on its site comes a negative - FB is now (or certainly SHOULD BE) liable for whatever content appears there. The do have an alternative, which is to be a content-neutral publisher of ALL posts from its members, without regulation - in which case it will be immune from any lawsuits based on the content of those posts.

FB CANNOT be allowed to continue regulating content without facing liability. Either it returns to being a content-neutral provider of posts and messenging services, or it should be subjected to liability for the content that it is regulating.

Paging AG Barr - Where TF are you? Where is your anti-trust division? Hello? ANYBODY HOME OVER THERE?


9 posted on 08/03/2020 9:03:55 AM PDT by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt, The Weapons Shops of Isher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22

He is a fraud.

Facebook aka The Facebook did not start with him. It started as a DARPA program called Life Log. It was hatched as a social media spy tool.

For example, a person is targeted for monitoring. How can one get close to this targeted person through ‘friends’ and ‘friends of friends’?

The intel rogues, notably CIA related, funded by deals in contraband weapons and drugs, ultimately by funds from off-book central bank fund transfers to ‘fronts’ meaning persons with no real skills but controlled and ‘malleable’, who will do what they’re told, or else, as the faces of trusts and accounts totalling in the hundreds of millions for each front, sometimes Hollywood has-beens, were and are directed to ‘invest’.

Zuckerberg, a college dropout, was selected to take Life Log public with Wall St ‘investment fronts’ ordered to back it.

Film studio ‘fronts’ were ordered to make a fiction of Zuckerberg romanticized in the film “The Social Network” to lay a false impression that Zuckerberg was a tech genius entrepreneur when in fact he’s a front, a billionaire created out of thin air.

There are several other Zuckerberg prototypes with similar scripts. Snowden with film ‘Snowden’ was to be romanticized similarly, to be made into a darling of the college crowd. But American patriots, with leaders like Flynn and Rogers, stopped the deification of Snowden as well as others.

Zuckerberg had a moment where he saw his place was at risk, he saw Americans were becoming aware of his real status, a growing faction were on to him, and he knew this faction was formidable, as formidable as the Trump movement. So he had talks with President Trump and for a moment expressed the view that Facebook would stay out of politics and censorship.

As soon as Zuckerberg released his new direction for Facebook, Soros announced to the media that Zuckerberg was siding with the Trump people. Scarcely a month later, Zuckerberg reverted and is once again firmly in the fold of private central bankers, persons who with a snap of their fingers can make funds (fiat) appear from nowhere in whatever amount needed according to a written script.


10 posted on 08/03/2020 9:11:05 AM PDT by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: raptor22

I’ll tell you how bad Facebook has gotten.
I posted this link to WHO.INT (World Health Organization)

https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/advice-for-public/myth-busters

FB keeps pulling it down as “false information” and saying I should refer to WHO.INT for the truth.


11 posted on 08/03/2020 10:39:34 AM PDT by Dalberg-Acton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson