Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

So they didn't discover that their findings were wrong, just the political implications of their work.
1 posted on 07/07/2020 3:15:46 PM PDT by CheshireTheCat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: CheshireTheCat

Truth is tough to get around.


2 posted on 07/07/2020 3:17:11 PM PDT by Old Yeller (Eternal lives matter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CheshireTheCat

but....science!!!!


3 posted on 07/07/2020 3:21:12 PM PDT by 2banana (Common ground with islamic terrorists-they want to die for allah and we want to arrange the meeting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CheshireTheCat

They didn’t lie and now are apologizing for it.

You must lie now.


4 posted on 07/07/2020 3:21:18 PM PDT by yarddog ( For I am persuaded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CheshireTheCat

Facts are irrelevant. Only the narrative is important.


5 posted on 07/07/2020 3:24:58 PM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CheshireTheCat

Probably the author’s career was threatened.


7 posted on 07/07/2020 4:06:20 PM PDT by Crucial
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CheshireTheCat

What a bunch of PNASes.


8 posted on 07/07/2020 4:37:10 PM PDT by NativeSon ( What Would Virginia Do? #WWVD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CheshireTheCat

Time to burn all the books yet?


9 posted on 07/07/2020 4:45:50 PM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CheshireTheCat
From the Univ of MD website:

David J. Johnson is a social-cognitive psychologist and postdoctoral researcher at the University of Maryland, College Park. He received his Ph.D. in Psychology from Michigan State University in 2016 and was a postdoctoral researcher there in 2017. His research employs computational models and secondary data analyses to study the psychological processes that underlie decisions. He has used this approach to understand decisions where law enforcement have shot unarmed civilians. His work in this area currently focuses on how several different factors—such as the race of the civilian, the context the shooting takes place in, and the dispatch information officers receive—influence the accuracy of these use of force decisions, as well as the basic cognitive processes that produce them.

10 posted on 07/07/2020 4:50:03 PM PDT by workerbee (==)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CheshireTheCat

Party of “science”


11 posted on 07/07/2020 5:39:10 PM PDT by Crim (Palin / West '16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CheshireTheCat

OK. In exchange for retracting the paper, make them pay back any grant funding they received during this period.


12 posted on 07/07/2020 6:29:16 PM PDT by neverevergiveup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CheshireTheCat

Our data is correct, however, you are using it in the wrong way. Remember that 2 + 2 equals whatever our social justice overlords tell us it equals.


14 posted on 07/07/2020 7:57:17 PM PDT by Sergio (An object at rest cannot be stopped! - The Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs at Midnight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson