Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: rlmorel

With a 1-mile blast radius there would be too much collateral damage. Not that the surrounding area is any better, truth be told.

26 posted on 06/21/2020 11:19:42 AM PDT by NohSpinZone (First thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: NohSpinZone

2-3 1000 pound JADAMs would fit perfectly, except the shrapnel from standing structures would go outside the target area.


32 posted on 06/21/2020 11:24:18 AM PDT by datura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: NohSpinZone

Not that the surrounding area is any better, truth be told.

************

Surrounding areas are in danger of being “annexed” by CHOP. I’m surprised they haven’t already taken additional territory since there doesn’t seem to be any resistance.

It will soon dawn on them that its there for the taking. As much as they want.


42 posted on 06/21/2020 11:28:53 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: NohSpinZone

I would prefer a tactical neutron bomb that would save most of the property while exterminating the vermin.


64 posted on 06/21/2020 11:47:19 AM PDT by freedomson (Tagline comment removed by moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: NohSpinZone

I don’t know why they always use the term blast radius or perhaps I misunderstand how radii is used in this context.

But wouldn’t a blast radius of 1 mile equal a blast DIAMETER of 2 miles and a blast surface area of 3.14 square miles and a blast circumference of 3.14 miles?


148 posted on 06/21/2020 2:34:52 PM PDT by mdmathis6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson