Posted on 06/10/2020 9:22:52 PM PDT by bitt
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation helped negotiate who would score a $100 million government-backed contact tracing contract in August 2019 — six months before the ‘pandemic’ arrived in the United States and four months before it swept through China. (Listen Above)
The shocking revelations were unveiled on the Thomas Paine Podcast and the Moore Paine Show on Patreon by the two investigators who blew the whistle on the massive Clinton Foundation tax fraud during a Congressional hearing in 2018. John Moynihan and Larry Doyle testified in Congress, detailing the fraud and schemes utilized by the Clinton’s to avoid paying up to $2.5 BILLION in federal taxes.
The investigative duo, in their first interview since that bombshell Congressional testimony, revealed to Paine that representatives from the Gates Foundation met with U.S. Congressman Bobby L. Rush at a sit down in Rwanda, East Africa in mid August 2019 to hash out who would score the windfall from a government contact tracing program. And just last month — nine months after the meetings with the Gates Foundation in Rwanda — Rush, a Democrat from Illinois, introduced the $100 BILLION H.R. 6666, the COVID-19 Testing, Reaching and Contacting Everyone (TRACE) Act.
Rush’s bill would establish a program run by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for national coronavirus testing and contact tracing.
Paine has since learned Congressman Rush traveled to Rwanda with his spouse from August 12th to 19th, 2019 to take part in talks and a week-long event underwritten by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Rockefeller Brothers Fund.
But how can you negotiate the byproducts of monitoring a pandemic six to seven months before the outbreak of the virus even happens?
This story is developing. Listen Above.
Listen to the insightful Thomas Paine Podcast Below --
Agafangel Diomidovich had walked all over the city - Liteiny, Nevsky, and beyond - and had seen everything. People were on a rampage. There were no authortites left in all Petersburg. Go rob anyone you like. Fires, retribution, disorderly and foolish gunfire, people killed by stray bullets, too. And there was no sign of joy from what he'd seen.
"Oh, it'll be bad." And a pause: "No one is thinking about what they're doing." How, where did it start? Nelidov wanted to understand. "Just you try and not go striking," the host said. They'll poke your eyes out with a screw, even we're afraid of 'em. They're just a handful, but they're at the top of everything. The cheeky one gets the upper hand, that's how it always is. Hey, what they came up with - drove out all the authorities. As if you could live with out 'em.
Sound familiar?
...there’s no real excuse for treating the February Revolution as a footnote, let alone for allowing its opening phase to disappear from popular history, particularly since its other great contribution to the future was setting a modern precedent for violent regime change driven by popular protest. I’ll leave you to decide if that counts as an achievement.
http://poppycockww1.com/russia/8-march-1917-false-start/
Sound familiar? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
A perfect replay.
What is happening in Seattle will not end well.
Specifically:
“Mass reinvention of memory isn’t a completely new phenomenon – I once blundered into redefining casualty figures for a Second World War battle by publishing an average of all the other figures quoted, and that was back in the 1980s – but the Net has been giving it some epidemic muscle. The seeds of this year’s ‘post-truth’ have been germinating on our devices for some time, looking like innocent mistakes of no great consequence but training us all to accept the idea that the loudest, most persistent voice is probably the one to believe.”
http://poppycockww1.com/russia/8-march-1917-false-start/
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.