Pulitzer Prize-Winning New York Times Writer: ‘Destroying Property Isn’t Violence’

Breitbart ^ | June 3, 2020 | Tristan Justice

[C19fan]

New York Times Pulitzer Prize-winning writer Nikole Hannah-Jones attempted to justify the ruthless rioting terrorizing American cities Tuesday by claiming simply, “property can be replaced.” “Violence is when an agent of the state kneels on a man’s neck until all of the life is leached out of his body,” Hannah-Jones said on CBS News. “Destroying property, which can be replaced, is not violence.”

[a fool in paradise]

>>New York Times Pulitzer Prize-winning writer Nikole Hannah-Jones attempted to justify the ruthless rioting terrorizing American cities Tuesday by claiming simply, “property can be replaced.”

Mao and the Taliban have shown us otherwise.

Cultural Marxists are purging the past.

[a fool in paradise]

Ask her if you can “take” someone’s virginity since the Left tells youth that it doesn’t really exist, it is a social construct.

[Political Junkie Too]

“Destroying property, which can be replaced, is not violence.”

Replaced by whom?

When a man puts his life's savings, the product of his lifelong labors, into a business that is destroyed by these rioters, how is this man's property going to be replaced when he already depleted his life's savings to build it in the first place?

-PJ

[oldenuff35]

I have news for this asshole. Arson is an act of deadly violence with hundreds of court cases to set this precedent.

He tells a good lie but the base line is that he is a liar.

[Cecily]

She is also arrogantly appropriating circus clown culture with that hair color (unless she has some circus clowns in the family). Ronald McDonald will be outraged.

[hal ogen]

What a confused sub-moron idiot. This fool should be exiled for her blatant and total stupidity. She is an embarrassment to humanity.

[polymuser]

American black women...so ignorant, so arrogant, so angry, so mean.

No wonder so many black men don’t really like them, unless they’re twerking.