Evaluate against observation? Don’t make me laugh.
Observation happens in the real world every day.
“Scientific Studies “ happen in research centers based on models paid for by political operatives who must be PC to have their models selected over real world observed results.
Anybody who thinks “scientific studies” are not biased to fit the desires of the client that funds them have never observed political polls in the newspapers.
Copernicus was almost burned at the stake because of “settled.science.”, and that was before Billion dollar Pharmaceuticals,and Communist Globalist insurgencies.
Zinc blocks viral activity, some more than others. HCQ stimulates zinc adsorption so it nukes COVID.
All studies to disprove Quinine exclude zinc. So they are NOT observational studies, they are carefully tailored to NOT observe healing but to “prove” that healing does not occur. That is a pure political operation to obscure actual results. That is trying once again to burn science at the stake. So wear the white coat and drape the talismanic stethoscope around their necks, but it’s a priesthood, not science I am observing.
There is all the difference in the world between politics dressing itself as science and science.
And when you publish something as settled fact and it is easily shown to conflict with observation, you are doing science. You are testing a hypothesis against data. That you have disproven the hypothesis is what science is all about.
And there are many absolutely brilliant scientists in Israel. You could learn something by talking to them. Indeed a lot of the reason jews are so good at science is that doing science is an awful lot like Talmudic disputation.
I don't even know where to start on correcting your appalling ignorance. But look in a mirror because you will see the public face of the kinds of ignorance that causes scientists to despise conservatives.