I don't even know where to start on correcting your appalling ignorance. But look in a mirror because you will see the public face of the kinds of ignorance that causes scientists to despise conservatives.
Yet these same “Doctors” love Liberals...
Yeah appalling ignorance that you cannot BEGIN to address. Because you simply cannot refute it, so its ignorance that you cannot address.
Try, just a little. Start by trying to understand what I said instead of trying to understand it by fitting it INTO your world view. Observation begins with looking OUTSIDE your world view. Ignorance is “ignoring” what does not fit your world view.
Politically Correct is a nice way of saying Believe a Lie because it does not fit the world view of those “in the know”.
I ain’t a buying it.
Observation: the model method does not work if the modeler has bias, divination by Artificial Intelligence is a fancy way of setting the parameters to get the result you expect and then blaming the computer not the person who set the parameters.
Using Computer Modeling to achieve a Political result does not validate the Politics any more than the American Heart Association study used to show that Vitamin E is harmful to the heart intentionally biased by using artificial Vitamin E instead of natural Vitamin E.
They either are too stupid to know that D alpha tocopherol is different from L alpha tocopherol, or expect us to not know because we are not Doctors. (I read the labels)
But the other studies, many times larger and with parallel findings showed that the use of 400 units of natural vitamin E daily reduces heart disease by 50%. No typo, 50, not 5.
Studies also found was that when L alpha was mixed with D alpha the body flushes out the artificial vitamin E along with a portion of the existing natural vitamin E.
Some how the American Heart Association did not study the studies that were causing a stir and used a 9 person study with 100% L alpha tocopherol to discount the taking of vitamin E. In fact they spent over 2 million dollars in media advertisements to fight the use of vitamin E.
After all, it would reduce their Billion dollar industry by half...
So a 9 person study that was tailored to achieve a predetermined result was used to obscure multiple studies with hundreds of patients over years of study for a Political Result.
And tens of thousands of people died and continue to die needlessly. All over the desire to have patients to treat instead of healthy people and donations.
How about the Cancer Industry. Yes those two words we are familiar with should NEVER be together...
Clue, get one.
Covid, don’t. Not without zinc in your diet, and a diet that is a healthy one. If 98% of what you eat is fried and brown, COVID is a very real danger to you.
Oh, that’s from a study that found by observation that most people dying from Covid have an unusual predominance of two strains of gut bacteria that are co-factors of Obesity and Diabetes. The study proposed that Covid may be a Bacteriophage and the runaway toxic death syndrome may be linked to the infection of those strains of bacteria by covid.
No Model can predict this kind of outcome because no modeler can discover anything new. They only model what they already understand.
THAT is the DIFFERENCE between Observational Science and Predictive Science.
So I have explained in length my PC comment, and at length the difference between modeling and observational science.
You have only offered scorn of me or of others.
I observe you must be a Democrat for you surely fit the model.