Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

EXCLUSIVE: TOP Scientist & HIV/AIDS Research Pioneer Dr. Judy Mikovits Blows Whistle on Dr. Fauci
TruePundit ^ | 4.21.20

Posted on 04/21/2020 4:37:29 PM PDT by spacejunkie2001

A top U.S. scientist and research pioneer has broken her long silence, revealing an insider’s nightmare spanning three decades of conducting research under the governmental control of Dr. Anthony Fauci. And the allegations are downright frightening. (more below)

And if true, these details warrant a host of NEW federal investigations to get to the bottom of numerous Fauci-led schemes revealed by Dr. Judy Mikovits on the Thomas Paine Podcast on Tuesday. Dr. Mikovits said Fauci helped imprison her after stealing her proprietary research not once, but twice and her allegations against the White House’s coronavirus top medical advisor and his government cronies paint a disturbing portrait of widespread institutional corruption. And greed. The alarming allegations include: stealing research, covering up tainted vaccines, fraud and much more. And Fauci’s parent agency, the National Institute of Health is not the only governmental agency involved in what amounts here to decades of corruption gone awry. Listen above or to the backup feed below —

(Excerpt) Read more at truepundit.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Education; Health/Medicine
KEYWORDS: anthonyfauci; corona; covid; covid19; dsj02; fauci; judymikovits; kentheckenlively; thomaspaine; whistleblower
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
To: dforest

Exactly. None so blind as those who refuse to look.


41 posted on 04/21/2020 10:07:39 PM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

She has 2 books if you want to read it. There is a lot of information, and most people have short attention spans so she couldn’t possibly tell her story in only little soundbites that most people can digest due to short attention spans.


42 posted on 04/21/2020 10:11:26 PM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

Yeah lots of people have been maligned with smears of lies. Oh like maybe the failed attempts on Clarence Thomas or Brett Kavanaugh. Only she was fighting big time corruption with people who had power and money to destroy her. Jesus was another person who was impugned, and many still impugn him to this day. So reputations may or may not be what is portrayed.


43 posted on 04/21/2020 10:16:42 PM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Widget Jr
Do you know how easy it is for rich powerful people to destroy the reputations of others? Look beyond what is said about her by listening to her. She tells a powerful story. Of course if you wish to praise Fauci and ignore what he has done to this country, than you deserve what is headed our way. Not trying to be mean, just pointing out the truth.

Fauci is a POS who deserves to be behind bars.

God created us with an immune system, and it functions quite well on its own. That is until man tries to intervene and F's it up as they usually do.

As my dad used to say, the road to hell is paved with "good intentions".

44 posted on 04/21/2020 10:23:49 PM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong
What about the later paper she co-authored A Multicenter Blinded Analysis Indicates No Association between Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/Myalgic Encephalomyelitis and either Xenotropic Murine Leukemia Virus-Related Virus or Polytropic Murine Leukemia Virus? The one that shows no link between XMRV and CFS that she co-authored? So how can she claim XMRV and Covid-19 now?

Her orginal work, that was retracted, was about XMRV and CFS, not vaccines or tainted blood. Why is she saying this now then?

45 posted on 04/21/2020 11:45:14 PM PDT by Widget Jr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Widget Jr

If you would listen to the podcast, you would know the answer to your question instead of making an ignorant fool of yourself.


46 posted on 04/21/2020 11:59:48 PM PDT by musicman (The future is just a collection of successive nows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong
She has 2 books if you want to read it.I would believer her if she could explain it in a few paragraphs. She has had years to do it. As Mark Twain once wrote "If I had more time this letter would have been shorter."

Brevity is the soul of wit, and this woman's inability top be brief shows she has little wit, which is a big problem for a scientist.

47 posted on 04/22/2020 4:41:40 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong

thanks very much Robert. It is not a stretch to believe the powers that be will ruin someone’s reputation to discredit them. Look what they’re doing to Trump. They just haven’t succeeded with him.


48 posted on 04/22/2020 7:05:17 AM PDT by spacejunkie2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson
Whatever you say Andy. You are obviously a much smarter person than I, for apparently you can judge someone by what others say, even though like you, they are relying solely upon what others have said about her. Kind of reminds me about Jesus's story. Since he is the son of God he should be able to sum up all life in at most 1 whole complete sentence. He doesn't need a stinking book.

There truly is none so blind as those who will not see. I personally could care less whether you watch for yourself or irrationally make your judgements based upon what others think. Just remember, following the herd does nothing but prove you are easily led. Where you are led to, more times than not, is not the best of places.

Kind of reminds me of when so many people determined that Robert Welch was nothing more than a kook in 1958. 62 years later his words seem more prophetic than those of a lunatic nutcase people back then perceived him as, and by default everyone involved in the John Birch Society. The herd got it wrong.

49 posted on 04/22/2020 7:10:38 AM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong

So you are saying that the little Farce hasn’t proven this to be true simply by his actions to date?


50 posted on 04/22/2020 7:18:39 AM PDT by JayAr36 (The worthless dispicable party must be destroyed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: spacejunkie2001

President Trump has the where with all to fight back. Most people do not. They lack either money, power, or both.


51 posted on 04/22/2020 7:20:49 AM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: JayAr36

Not at all. I am saying he is an evil person, whereas before I thought he was just a fool and a tool. 8>)


52 posted on 04/22/2020 7:48:07 AM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong
I have no idea the truth of the matter here, but as a scientist I have long experience with this sort of thing. One is always suspicious of scientists seeking the glare of publicity rather than working away on their research projects - except in the case where a research group is announcing a major discovery, you know like gravity wave detection from colliding black holes or some such.

Seeking the glare of publicity to cast someone else in a negative light, as she has done here is exactly the sort of thing that scientists don't do. If Faucci is a fraud, there are plenty of highly repubatable virologists and immunologists who can bring relevant facts to bear. Usually the way one does this is to write an article in peer reviewed journal disputing someone else's research claims. To do this you have to have arguments and experimental evidence that will stand up to rational scientific scrutiny.

That is not what she is doing here. And whatever one's views of the John Birch society, that was a political society, not a scientific one.

53 posted on 04/22/2020 7:54:20 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

Well sometimes the story must be told, because well, it is that important. I think she would have preferred not to have had this story that needed telling, because that means she had to live it for real. The story is worth listening to before making snap judgements. As a scientist I am sure you do not let your fellow colleagues tell you what to believe, but rather you choose to see for yourself. 8>)


54 posted on 04/22/2020 8:11:26 AM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong

yes


55 posted on 04/22/2020 8:23:37 AM PDT by spacejunkie2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong

IF it’s true. Big IF.


56 posted on 04/22/2020 8:24:19 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

My sister was a technical writer and made great money writing up the research done by many PhD researchers. According to her very few could write anything that was readable.

This one may be off the mark or untrustworthy but her lack of writing skills may not be evidence of that.


57 posted on 04/22/2020 8:33:25 AM PDT by Tammy8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson
Well listening to her, she comes off as sincere, and extremely knowledgeable. But decide for yourself. I helped by suggesting that one skip to 36:21 where the actual interview with her begins. If you need or want to pause the podcast hit the pause button. To restart from where you paused it at though, right click on the podcast player. I find that works best, or at least it did for me. 8>)

I for one found her story to be very compelling and believable. While I have no direct experience with NIH, my dad worked there for many years, and he would tell me of corrupt goings on there. There were no whistleblower protections back then, so his venting to me was all he could do. He had to share it with someone, to save his sanity I believe. He finally took an early out. That is how bad it was. NIH was a very political place, not a place concerned in the least with the health of this nation's citizens. My father was a grant manager. In other words he was the one that approved or denied grant money to those who applied for grant money. He was pressured to approve grants based upon political connections, while denying grant money to projects that had real projects that would have made a difference.

58 posted on 04/22/2020 8:45:27 AM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong

Redfield is a total POS. How are any of these wicked scoundrels still in our government and high up to boot??


59 posted on 04/22/2020 10:30:06 AM PDT by spacejunkie2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Widget Jr

keep living in the dark. they bankrupted her so who can blame her writing a book? look what they’ve done to Trump, Flynn, Carter Page, Roger Stone, etc. If you don’t think the enemy will destroy you if you’re exposing their dastardly deeds, you are NOT opening your eyes.


60 posted on 04/22/2020 10:32:01 AM PDT by spacejunkie2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson