Posted on 04/21/2020 4:37:29 PM PDT by spacejunkie2001
A top U.S. scientist and research pioneer has broken her long silence, revealing an insiders nightmare spanning three decades of conducting research under the governmental control of Dr. Anthony Fauci. And the allegations are downright frightening. (more below)
And if true, these details warrant a host of NEW federal investigations to get to the bottom of numerous Fauci-led schemes revealed by Dr. Judy Mikovits on the Thomas Paine Podcast on Tuesday. Dr. Mikovits said Fauci helped imprison her after stealing her proprietary research not once, but twice and her allegations against the White Houses coronavirus top medical advisor and his government cronies paint a disturbing portrait of widespread institutional corruption. And greed. The alarming allegations include: stealing research, covering up tainted vaccines, fraud and much more. And Faucis parent agency, the National Institute of Health is not the only governmental agency involved in what amounts here to decades of corruption gone awry. Listen above or to the backup feed below
(Excerpt) Read more at truepundit.com ...
Exactly. None so blind as those who refuse to look.
She has 2 books if you want to read it. There is a lot of information, and most people have short attention spans so she couldn’t possibly tell her story in only little soundbites that most people can digest due to short attention spans.
Yeah lots of people have been maligned with smears of lies. Oh like maybe the failed attempts on Clarence Thomas or Brett Kavanaugh. Only she was fighting big time corruption with people who had power and money to destroy her. Jesus was another person who was impugned, and many still impugn him to this day. So reputations may or may not be what is portrayed.
Fauci is a POS who deserves to be behind bars.
God created us with an immune system, and it functions quite well on its own. That is until man tries to intervene and F's it up as they usually do.
As my dad used to say, the road to hell is paved with "good intentions".
Her orginal work, that was retracted, was about XMRV and CFS, not vaccines or tainted blood. Why is she saying this now then?
If you would listen to the podcast, you would know the answer to your question instead of making an ignorant fool of yourself.
Brevity is the soul of wit, and this woman's inability top be brief shows she has little wit, which is a big problem for a scientist.
thanks very much Robert. It is not a stretch to believe the powers that be will ruin someone’s reputation to discredit them. Look what they’re doing to Trump. They just haven’t succeeded with him.
There truly is none so blind as those who will not see. I personally could care less whether you watch for yourself or irrationally make your judgements based upon what others think. Just remember, following the herd does nothing but prove you are easily led. Where you are led to, more times than not, is not the best of places.
Kind of reminds me of when so many people determined that Robert Welch was nothing more than a kook in 1958. 62 years later his words seem more prophetic than those of a lunatic nutcase people back then perceived him as, and by default everyone involved in the John Birch Society. The herd got it wrong.
So you are saying that the little Farce hasn’t proven this to be true simply by his actions to date?
President Trump has the where with all to fight back. Most people do not. They lack either money, power, or both.
Not at all. I am saying he is an evil person, whereas before I thought he was just a fool and a tool. 8>)
Seeking the glare of publicity to cast someone else in a negative light, as she has done here is exactly the sort of thing that scientists don't do. If Faucci is a fraud, there are plenty of highly repubatable virologists and immunologists who can bring relevant facts to bear. Usually the way one does this is to write an article in peer reviewed journal disputing someone else's research claims. To do this you have to have arguments and experimental evidence that will stand up to rational scientific scrutiny.
That is not what she is doing here. And whatever one's views of the John Birch society, that was a political society, not a scientific one.
Well sometimes the story must be told, because well, it is that important. I think she would have preferred not to have had this story that needed telling, because that means she had to live it for real. The story is worth listening to before making snap judgements. As a scientist I am sure you do not let your fellow colleagues tell you what to believe, but rather you choose to see for yourself. 8>)
yes
IF its true. Big IF.
My sister was a technical writer and made great money writing up the research done by many PhD researchers. According to her very few could write anything that was readable.
This one may be off the mark or untrustworthy but her lack of writing skills may not be evidence of that.
I for one found her story to be very compelling and believable. While I have no direct experience with NIH, my dad worked there for many years, and he would tell me of corrupt goings on there. There were no whistleblower protections back then, so his venting to me was all he could do. He had to share it with someone, to save his sanity I believe. He finally took an early out. That is how bad it was. NIH was a very political place, not a place concerned in the least with the health of this nation's citizens. My father was a grant manager. In other words he was the one that approved or denied grant money to those who applied for grant money. He was pressured to approve grants based upon political connections, while denying grant money to projects that had real projects that would have made a difference.
Redfield is a total POS. How are any of these wicked scoundrels still in our government and high up to boot??
keep living in the dark. they bankrupted her so who can blame her writing a book? look what they’ve done to Trump, Flynn, Carter Page, Roger Stone, etc. If you don’t think the enemy will destroy you if you’re exposing their dastardly deeds, you are NOT opening your eyes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.