Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Different Take on Federalism Part I
ArticleVBlog ^ | April 13th 2020 | Rodney Dodsworth

Posted on 04/13/2020 2:57:41 AM PDT by Jacquerie

Subtitle: The Insidious 17th Amendment.

The 17th Amendment did to federalism what the 13th Amendment did to slavery. Both are long-gone vestiges of our framing era. Tenth Amendment? States’ rights? Poof, and not only long-gone but neither slavery nor federalism can possibly return without repeal of their respective amendments.

Conservatives would do well to consider the 13th – 15th Amendments. Beginning with freeing slaves, then prohibiting state violations of privileges or immunities, securing due process, equal protection and entitling blacks to vote, the post-civil war amendments fundamentally altered society and the federal/state government relationship. Unlike the pre-civil war Constitution, the post-civil war amendments specifically charged congress, and not the judiciary by implication or otherwise, with enforcement. “Congress shall have the power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation,” (or equivalent wording) closes the 13th – 15th Amendments.1 And a federal congress did just that. Congresses enacted assorted legislation to secure the franchise for blacks and liberty for all.

Before Scotus got into the habit of amending the US Constitution, state constitutions, federal and state laws, it was the presence of the states in the senate that kept a lid on, and prevented abuse of, the 14th and 15th amendments. While the 14th Amendment nationalized citizenship and granted congress enormous enforcement power, so long as the senate that had to concur in the actual employment of that enormous power was elected by state legislatures, federalism and the interests of the states as states remained secure.

(Excerpt) Read more at articlevblog.com ...


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: 14thamendment; 17thamendment; federalism

1 posted on 04/13/2020 2:57:41 AM PDT by Jacquerie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie
I hate to tell you people this, but the 10th Amendment died at Appomattox. The secessions of 1861 where the original Article V, and that didn’t work out too well. The freedom the U.S. enjoyed at its founding ceased to exist as a result of that war. Look no further than the 14 Amendment for validation:

All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof... (emphasis mine)

We are all merely subjects now.

2 posted on 04/13/2020 5:52:50 AM PDT by beancounter13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

Excellent read. Thanks for the post.


3 posted on 04/13/2020 5:54:07 AM PDT by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. Mr Trump, we've got your six.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PubliusMM

I thank you back!


4 posted on 04/13/2020 8:07:54 AM PDT by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

.


5 posted on 04/13/2020 12:26:45 PM PDT by redinIllinois (Pro-life, accountant, gun-totin' Grandma - multi issue voter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson