Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: lepton

Not so. Only if the person has committed, or is about to commit a crime.

http://www.lpdirect.net/casb/crs/16-3-103.html

(1) A peace officer may stop any person who he reasonably suspects is committing, has committed, or is about to commit a crime and may require him to give his name and address, identification if available, and an explanation of his actions. A peace officer shall not require any person who is stopped pursuant to this section to produce or divulge such person’s social security number. The stopping shall not constitute an arrest.


32 posted on 04/08/2020 6:20:19 AM PDT by abb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: abb

Not so. Only if the person has committed, or is about to commit a crime.


The standard for that is probable cause. In this case the police botched the association with a crime - which is a problem for them - but if they believed it to be a crime, then they have probable cause to meet the criteria for the section you posted.


37 posted on 04/08/2020 6:34:07 AM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson