Unfortunately, The Answer Is Hillary

American Thinker ^ | 3/6/2020 | Joel Gilbert

[Mama Shawna]

No. Two terms, period. Read amendment 22 to the constitution. It says nothing about a third term, for ANY reason.

[Sicon]

Old Sack-of-Potatoes Shrillary. LOL!!!

[Sam Gamgee]

Funny this thought came to me last night before falling asleep. What a snooker on voters that would be, but why not? Joe will get his next quid pro quo and its Hillary vs Trump again! Woo hoo!

[KenD]

Thanks for the clarification. I had read something somewhere about trying to shoe horn Barack O in there somehow. I’m at a trade show and didn’t have time to investigate the 22nd.

[Old Yeller]

Hillary will force her way on the ticket by bribery and blackmail and death threats.

[Verginius Rufus]

The limit is two terms, whether consecutive or not, except that a person who has served less than two years of a term to which someone else was elected may be elected twice, so the maximum is 10 years.

Actually there could be a way around that. If the President and Vice President were to resign at the same time, or be killed at the same time, the Speaker of the House would succeed. So if Hillary and Michelle were elected President and Vice President and Barack was Speaker, and they both resigned, then he would succeed to the White House. But it might be as Acting President rather than President.

[Verginius Rufus]

If Biden is obviously failing by summer and the DNC picks Hillary as the nominee, she could pick Al Gore for VP. That would fire up the global warming cultists, and they could use any old Clinton/Gore campaign signs.

[Phlyer]

You're right about re-running losers, of course. I should have said 'in the modern era,' meaning since there were a significant number of primaries. Dimm voters don't like to re-nominate a loser.

However, your comment did cause me to look things up and I found that William Jennings Bryan was nominated three times, and lost every time.

However, I was encouraged to see that there was only once when the re-nominated loser won, and that was Grover Cleveland who had won the presidency once, and won the popular vote in the year he lost, before coming back to win again. So the track record of re-nominated losers is not good.

I have been discouraged, however, by the degree of voter fraud we've seen in the last several cycles. In an honest election the Dimms have no chance. But when as many as 30% of the votes in some states are not single votes by legal citizens voting freely, anything can happen.

I still hold to my original post and point on this topic: The Dimms will want to nominate someone who checks as many of the identity politics blocks as they can and that is Moochelle with the miracle last name.

[Trump Girl Kit Cat]

NO WAY Michelle goes near POTUS I don’t think Michelle OR Obama give a rats ass about the Dem party OR the country, they made their millions and are quite happy on their beach front property!! Neither one of them liked the whole POTUS thing and I think they just want to be left alone!! Just sayin!!

[CheshireTheCat]

Please, please, please, let it be Hillary. I would love to see her run again. This time she will lose all of the states she lost in 16 plus NH, Maine, MN, and NM.

[bobby.223]

Big Mike be SCHLONGED...(Literally!)