[Reno89519]

I am talking about pot, which is against federal law and it is a shame that it is often now legal on local level. No, not same as alcohol. Sorry, won’t go there.

[BipolarBob]

I am talking about pot, which is against federal law and it is a shame that it is often now legal on local level.

I'll take the other side of that argument and say pot should NOT be illegal under federal law. People should have a right to defend themselves. Period.

[familyop]

Agreed. Drug addicts and drug-addicted alcoholics have demonstrated their tendency to violate the rights of others beyond well enough. It’s common knowledge. Also, notice their nasty language, personal insults and underhanded threats from time to time, when they don’t like what non-addicts have said. They’re criminals.

[Ken H]

So you side with the ATF over the Second and Tenth Amendments.

[Crim]

States rights bud....get used to it...prohibition has failed again....thankfully.

And yeah...if you dont support the same restrictions for other legal drugs...such as alcohol and scripts...this qualifies as hypocrisy.

[Svartalfiar]

I am talking about pot, which is against federal law and it is a shame that it is often now legal on local level. No, not same as alcohol. Sorry, won’t go there.

You're right, they are different. Somehow we needed a Constitutional amendment for the FedGov to ban alcohol, yet pot didn't? What part of the Constitution mentions regulating pot, but they forgot to include alcohol in that list?