Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Kanye West will be Trump’s Successor in the White House
DB Daily Update ^ | Larry Schweikart

Posted on 03/02/2020 9:21:50 AM PST by EyesOfTX

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last
To: Rusty0604

Indeed. Strange as it may sound, the Kardashians & Kanye have gone to church throughout their marriage.


61 posted on 03/03/2020 5:22:38 AM PST by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: EyesOfTX

As long as he chooses Vanilla Ice for SoS.


62 posted on 03/03/2020 5:25:52 AM PST by Leep (Everyday is Trump Day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS; EyesOfTX; Pearls Before Swine; Responsibility2nd; treetopsandroofs; Lurkinanloomin; b4me; ...
Hegemony of the Handsome: American politics should be uglier.

That’s not a great link, unfortunately, because it’s an excerpt of an old (2002) OpinionJournal article. But in the article, Michael Medved made the point that no bald man had been POTUS since Eisenhower - that is, since the advent of TV as a big-time influence.

And that since so many mature men are bald (I resemble that remark), TV has biased our politics against, presumptively, about half of the set of people who should be considered for the presidency.

Recall John Kerry and his running mate John Edwards, cheerfully boasting of how wonderful their hair was . . .

The point is that the Republic has been blessed with Ronald Reagan and Donald Trump, but there is no necessary correlation between attractiveness and executive ability.

63 posted on 03/03/2020 7:16:52 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (Socialism is cynicism directed towards society and - correspondingly - naivete towards government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion

Sorry, not reading anything by Medved, the amnesty apologist Bush League Republican propagandist.


64 posted on 03/03/2020 7:22:22 AM PST by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizens Are Born Here of Citizen Parents_Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion
Recall John Kerry and his running mate John Edwards, cheerfully boasting of how wonderful their hair was . . .

Jon Edwards was called "the silky pony" for a reason.

65 posted on 03/03/2020 7:22:23 AM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion

Trump looks at least as good as he did when he took office. :-)


66 posted on 03/03/2020 7:45:02 AM PST by treetopsandroofs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: LS
You expect Trump to win, based on personality and performance, and I agree. But it is also true that historically, senators (and/or VPs, same difference) don’t defeat sitting presidents’ reelection bids and don’t even defeat governors in a race for an open seat (sole exception: Warren G. Harding, in a wave election). And since Trump's November opponent won’t be a governor, a Trump victory in November seems likely indeed. I worry about Bloomberg’s hostile billions, but . . .

I wouldn’t be too quick to assume that Mike Pence won’t win the ’24 nomination. Sitting VP’s do tend to win presidential nominations. But it is true that in the modern era only Andrew Jackson and Ronald Reagan have seen their sitting VPs win election to POTUS.

So a Pence victory in ’24 would hardly be a sure thing, unless people are wishing for a third Trump term by then. But assuming continued Trump effectiveness - and given that Mr. Pence is a former governor who attained national office within 5 years of attaining statewide office - I would assume that he would run very strongly against any Democrat in ’24.

In addition, as a former talk show host Pence is qualified to handle TV well.


67 posted on 03/03/2020 7:53:51 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (Socialism is cynicism directed towards society and - correspondingly - naivete towards government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EyesOfTX; null and void; aragorn; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; Beautiful_Gracious_Skies; bgill; bitt; ...

Why Kanye West will be Trump’s Successor in the White House

68 posted on 03/03/2020 8:15:55 AM PST by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion

I think people are getting thrown off a bit by the fact that Ronald Reagan was an actor and Donald Trump was a media celebrity. That’s NOT why they won, nor is it why they were (are) both successful conservative leaders.

Anyone old enough to have been an adult conservative during Ronald Reagan’s ascendency knows that it was his detractors who focused on the acting part of his background, and that it was his detractors who created the “great communicator” meme, which was a backhanded complement intended to suggest that he was all polish, no substance.

Ronald Reagan was a deeply rooted conservative thinker whose success had little if any to do with his having been in show biz.

Although less obvious, I have been convinced for several years now that the same can be said about Donald Trump. There’s a lot more substance there than meets the eye. He hides it on purpose, because he wants to connect with rural America, and he knows talking like William Buckley about conservative philosophy isn’t going to get the job done.

But if you look at old Trump videos from the 1980s - he exhibits a completely different persona. Quiet, thoughtful, articulate and well versed in history.

Here’s the thing. There is no way on Earth Donald Trump could possibly accomplish what he has accomplished, withstand what he has withstood, and remain such a straight and true arrow for the conservative movement, unless his governing philosophy was deeply rooted in conservative principles. He doesn’t show it, but I guarantee it’s there.

It has been a real eye-opener to watch people like Mark Levin and others transform from being virtual #neverTrumpers, all the way to comparing him to Ronald Reagan.

Maybe there is more to Kayne West than I am seeing, but if he is to be Trump’s successor, it will require more than his mass appeal as a celebrity - it will require a deep and unshakable foundation in conservative thought.


69 posted on 03/03/2020 8:28:38 AM PST by enumerated
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion

I don’t base any of this on history. I think we’re way beyond that. I base everything on Breitbart’s notion that politics is downstream of culture.

Pence isn’t even remotely plugged into the culture.


70 posted on 03/03/2020 8:41:30 AM PST by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion

So what are you saying about Plugs Biden?


71 posted on 03/03/2020 8:54:54 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: enumerated

Also, surveys have shown that the right kind of bald man appearance (think Vin Diesel) gets points for virility. And I don’t think we’ve generally had that kind of appearance in bald men running for president.


72 posted on 03/03/2020 8:57:49 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion

Pence was a *radio* talk show host.

And there is something off about Pence, where his look and sound is just too ingratiating somehow to seem real and authentic.

At best he might squeak in on Trump’s coattails for one term, but he’d never make it on his own (putting him in the Poppy Bush bucket).

Unfortunately I think the ambitions of Trump’s Manhattan liberal daughter and SIL, who just now (I mean just now: https://www.google.com/search?q=ivanka+trump&oq=ivanka+trump&aqs=chrome..69i57.2645j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8) registered as Republicans, will enter Trump’s calculus.

I just don’t know how deluded and impatient Ivanka might be about her own apparent presidential ambitions.


73 posted on 03/03/2020 9:04:19 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

I really dislike “royal families”. I will only tolerate it if the opposition is so bad I am forced to!


74 posted on 03/03/2020 9:09:51 AM PST by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Reily

Agreed. The whole family dynasties thing shouldn’t touch politics—and the presidency especially.


75 posted on 03/03/2020 9:12:32 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: LucyT; LS
I think Trump will be in WH until 2024 and then Trump JR will take over for Pence in 2028 and Ivanka will take over in 2036 so maybe in 2044 West will have a shot...
76 posted on 03/03/2020 9:19:06 AM PST by GregNH (If you can't fight, please find a good place to hide!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: EyesOfTX
Does Kanye still like fish sticks?


77 posted on 03/03/2020 9:23:13 AM PST by Magnum44 (My comprehensive terrorism plan: Hunt them down and kill them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Magnum44

78 posted on 03/03/2020 9:25:53 AM PST by Magnum44 (My comprehensive terrorism plan: Hunt them down and kill them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Reily

Yuck—just listen to Ivanka brag about her fundraising capabilities. She really thinks it is her and not her father.

https://www.salon.com/2020/03/03/ivanka-and-jared-register-as-republicans-now-people-like-us-feel-comfortable-being-part-of-gop/


79 posted on 03/03/2020 9:29:54 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

I think I could mentally make a case for Donald Jr. I still would not be happy about it. Ivanka almost impossible to do unless the Rat nominee is Occasional-Cortex, Warren, Butt-Giggily, or some other Rat sociopath.


80 posted on 03/03/2020 9:35:06 AM PST by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson