Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: RubinBoomer

If this is a bona-fide unit, they must investigate and respond to any complaints.
Why wouldn’t law abiding citizens of SC county report illegal immigrants suspected of possessing firearms?


50 posted on 02/27/2020 4:39:49 AM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel (Scatology is serendipitous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: Cletus.D.Yokel
If this is a bona-fide unit, they must investigate and respond to any complaints. Why wouldn’t law abiding citizens of SC county report illegal immigrants suspected of possessing firearms?

My previous posts on this thread dealt with 2A rights and whether they should be restored to reformed citizens and whether there should be barriers to obtaining firearms for law abiding citizens. Adding wetbacks to the discussion conflates the issue. Illegals are illegals and they should be deported, firearms or not. Adding another level of law enforcement experienced in confiscating firearms is a slippery slope. Eventually they will come for law abiding citizen's firearms. The bottom line of the previous discussion is if you did your time, paid your debt to society, then you should have full rights restored as a citizen. Any law that infringes on law abiding citizen's ability to obtain a firearm, e.g., delay, postpone, charge a fee, etc., doesn't stop criminals for obtaining firearms. Lifelong criminals, not the reformed, will break the law to obtain a firearm. We should not give up freedom for safety, particularly when it really doesn't make us safe.

51 posted on 02/27/2020 4:58:39 AM PST by RubinBoomer (Please be nice. I am new here. I'm open to doing things the FR way, just need to know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson