It wuz an accident! Honest!
Total weasel words.
Hummina Hummina Hummina...
Maybe he used Comey’s friend to do the leak.
Bolton has gone from a man I respected to a man with zero credibility > IMO.
Boy was I wrong about him.
Bolton did not intend to leak. The Hillary Clinton Defense.
Pres Trump says not true. ukraine says there was no pressure.. bolton has denied it ...but its the top story on the news.
I just heard Joe DiGenova being interviewed about the “Bolton quotation.” He gave this important information: LTC Vindman’s twin brother is the person to whom the NSC assigned the declassification review of Bolton’s manuscript.
Go to the 2:07:00 mark to begin listening to the interview:
http://www.wmal.com/2020/01/27/mornings-on-the-mall-01-27-20-joe-digenova-andy-pollin-nathan-brinkman-michael-pack/
I recommend that Yevgennihy Vindman be investigated as the possible leaker of Bolton’s manuscript.
Who is going to buy his d*** book?
I always thought that Bolton was a good guy, pro Israel, but here we are, he turned into a major schmuck..got something to say John, say it in PUBLIC, dont be a sleaze bag and write some pathetic book hoping to make some money, have a press conference, do a sit down interview with CNN or MSNBC, they would have rolled out the red carpet for the douche bag..bottom line is, Bolton wanted war with Iran, Bolton didnt want Trump to talk to Kim Jung Un, Bolton wanted war with Russia, Trump didnt so he gave him the heave ho
John The Rat Whore.
“The Room Where It Happened? What a come on title, OR maybe referring to the sex acts that took place between Bill and Monica.
This is all The New York times and the Democrats doing.. They made up the story about anonymous sources and put it out after they the left admitted that the Lawyers for Trump blew the Dem managers impeachment story out of the water!! This is only meant to drag this out and make the Republicans do the Hou8ses work for them!!
Bolton needs to deny the report.
The Bolton quid pro quo account is a fabrication designed to promote book sales pure and simple. If anything the book should not be published before the election if it involves one man’s interpretations of conversations that should be classified in the first place.
Also, one could explore the possibility of quid pro quo in conversation, but to actually implement it, is another matter. I remember Trump in the TV show, “The Apprentice,” engaging in a conversation that is opposite of what he wanted. It was intended to draw out thinking that would expose the person’s desire to promote the undertaking. Trump gave the impression he was on board with the thinking, making the person think he was an ally. This was done to cause the person to let down their guard. Once the person exposed themselves, the words, “You’re fired!” rang out. We see what happened to Bolton.
This whole Bolton story is a distraction to change the media narrative from Trump acquitted by Friday to let’s ignore the House’s terrible case and have the Senate call witnesses to prolong the story indefinitely thereby making more money for the media and damaging Trump’s re-election campaign. Trump was concerned globally with foreign aid going to corrupt governments. Ukraine and a dozen other countries were under review and Ukraine was approved for continuing funding before current funding expired. Biden corruption was already noted by many media sources.
OF COURSE Bolton knew the book would leak. He gave it to the NSC to review! He knew the leaks of his book would help his book sales and hurt Trump. That's all he cared about.
And to think I once liked the guy very much. Bah!
As for all this "quid pro quo" nonsense, isn't "quid pro quo" the definition of "foreign policy"?
Notice how this statement names the full title of the book and where to buy it. Advertising plug much? Might as well be a 10 second ad buy.
Yeah, John. We understand the concept of ‘plausible deniability’. You must think we’re pretty stupid.
Never have liked that guy.