Posted on 11/15/2019 8:29:06 AM PST by Tench_Coxe
No, hidden under 30 paragraphs, the Post tried to drop this bombshell hoping no one would notice [emphasis added]:
The shift came after the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee conducted focus groups in key House battlegrounds in recent weeks, testing messages related to impeachment. Among the questions put to participants was whether “quid pro quo,” “extortion” or “bribery” was a more compelling description of Trump’s conduct. According to two people familiar with the results, which circulated among Democrats this week, the focus groups found “bribery” to be most damning. The people spoke on the condition of anonymity because the results have not been made public.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
That includes their media confederates.
His Periscope is HILARIOUS.
The. charge of the day is that the President’s tweet this morning during the State Dept. whiner’s testimony made him guilty of “witness tampering!” He’s supposed to shut up, with no defense allowed, while they lie about him on national television. Heinous murderers are treated better than our president is being treated by these un-American haters.
A reverse bribery with no assignable cash value to the “bribe”. And not committed, but only “attempted”. And ascribed to an act more plausibly attributable to a mandate from Congress. How many of our previous Presidents would be immune to such a charge? Any of them?
As I remember,concerning kosova, Billy clinton had a focus group come up with what the public would react to the most.
Genocide was the answer.
Obama used that ruse to attack Libya too
25 minutes of hilarious mockery of the Democrats and Joe Biden.
https://twitter.com/ScottAdamsSays/status/1195356015153139712
I heard a rumor that when this “get rid of Trump” attempt fails, as have several others, they’ll go after him for running a red light when he first got his driver’s license.
Or trying to purchase 16 items in the supermarket Express Lane.
There should only be non-secret and public focus groups.
Well, to be honest, they cannot use quid pro quo when that brings up the video image of Biden helping his son and would lead to inconvenient questions about the profiting kids of Pelosi, Kerry, and others.
LOL.
They have other things in the pipeline. I heard Ocasio-Cortez saying how he’s guilty of violating the emoluments clause. They probably have several more impeachable offenses ready to be revealed, if the Ukraine thing falls apart.
This would be laughable if not so serious. They want to impeech Trump over a phone call. And you have to parse the language and diagram the sentences to arrive at the alleged criminal act committed from that call.
In all seriousness, they will continue to come up with things as they go to keep the train rolling to the election.
I look forward to seeing what Trump has to derail this whole thing.
“Look, I’m not advocating. But it does prompt the question of why aren’t these people being drug out into the street and hung from the nearest lamp post?”
Because good men are not advocating, leading and executing the necessary correction.
How about when he went "Up the down staircase" in high school one time? Disgusting!
I ran focus groups for over 5 years. If top management paying for the focus groups does not interfere with who is selected, what is covered and how a certain group feels about whatever.
Focus groups may be the most valid way to “sample” what is working or not with a key group.
Is liars, scoundrels or traitors or a more compelling description of Democrats’ conduct?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.