Grassly just said the IG is running a cover-up. Who are we to believe?
Is Barr going after Horowitz???
Waterboard the whole bunch.
Well...they may be looking at mealie mouth Warner and his cronies in the DS. I always thought it was strange that DiFi’s china spy was outed. Looks like she took a powder when she saw the FISA docs being leaked to the NYT, and that may have been retaliation.
Durham is not an IG.
I hope my skepticism that anything ever happens turns out to be unwarranted, but I am doubtful
The IG Horowitz had apparently said what is happening now is vetting his report for security clearances vs redactions and it isn’t Horowitz who is allowed to do this vetting, it’s whomever normally vets for security clearances vs redactions in such matters. And Horowitz is hinting that a battle over THAT is all that remains re: the official release.
I’m not directing this to a specific person but only noting that someone on this thread seems to be conflating Horowitz with John Durham.
For anyone, John Durham is Barr’s appointee to investigate the origins of the spying on Trump. Durham is a Connecticut U.S. Attorney with the strongest possible reputation and credentials for the job... . He’s the one who greatly expanded his investigation.
IG Horowitz is poised to issue his report into internal wrongdoing at Justice/FBI.
There are two IGs in this mess.
Horowitz is the JOG OIG, and Atkinson is the ICIG.
Horowitz is the one investigating misconduct within the FBI on the FISA warrants, and Atkinson is the one that accepted the whistleblower complaint against Trump’s Ukraine phone call.
“You’se can’t tell the players without a program!”
DOJ-IG Horowitz is go-along, get-along guy.
IC-IG Atkinson is a law-breaking skunk, out to get Trump.
CIA-IG is a vacant post.
IG in general have the job of investigating internal malfeasance, and forwaring any evidence that comrises evidence of criminal activity to the DOJ for consideration.
Barr is Attorney General, top dog in DOJ.
US Attorney Durham works for AG Barr. Generally, US Attorney only work on cases where some other agency (usually FBI) has investigated and found probable cause of a crime. But Durham may have been tasked to investigate, in light of the fact that thte FBI is not a trustworthy investigator, and also in light of the fact that FBI was active in the coup. Can;t have the FBI investigate itself, that is a conflict of interest, and they will NEVER admit error.
At any rate, all the IG’s can be running cover-up, and that does not control what Barr directs.
Live on C-SPAN, hearing with FBI, Q by Rep. Lesko of Arizona to FBI is does Crowdstrike have the server? FBI doesn’t know.
“Grassly just said the IG is running a cover-up. Who are we to believe?”
I wouldn’t be surprised if Horowitz is, but I think Durham may be on the level.
They are on a tightrope. They want you to BELIEVE they are doing an aggressive investigation. But they also want to whitewash this. If the truth is known then the government will implode.