Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: red-dawg
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof..."

He must have scored very low on reading comprehension. Of course, that clause was written by long-dead white males in some sort of strange language they used back then. It IS rather hard to understand, isn't it?

34 posted on 10/11/2019 8:12:01 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: ProtectOurFreedom

The problem is the Constitution doesn’t guarantee that churches/synagogues/whatever religious organization are guaranteed to not have to pay *taxes*.

This is the problem with being a 501c(3) organization. You end up getting addicted, financially, to the tax benefits because the government can then change the rules for what qualifies as “tax exempt” at any time.

Best not to claim such status, even if you’re a charity/non-profit of some kind. It pays off in the long run, no pun intended, because then you can and do enjoy all the protections of the Constitution regarding your freedom of expression.

Sadly though many of the larger churches depend on the tax exempt status to operate now. So, it’s a problem, if people like Beto get elected.


42 posted on 10/11/2019 8:19:30 AM PDT by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson