Posted on 09/26/2019 8:34:09 AM PDT by golux
Whistleblower's "sources" are comprised of what he heard from colleagues, from colleagues' colleagues, and on CNN and in the Washington Post and other mainstream media.
There IS no "whistleblower" as a direct witness to anything.
It begs the question as how a lower level operative in the intelligence service has access to the contents of a telephone call between the POTUS and a foreign leader. Was the presidents phone bugged? I see no reason why anyone outside of the White House should have access to these conversations. It is clear the whistle blower did not directly hear any of these conversations and everything is pure hearsay colored with partisan bias and deliberately leaked to the media.
Yep.
I have to hand it to the rats. Every day I think I could not possibly despise democrats more than I already do. Every day they rise to the challenge and sink to new that convince me to despise them more than I already did.
The “evidence” is all “hearsay,” which is NOT, I believe, admissible as evidence in a trial. But then these are Democrapts.
This is too well organized on the Democrats side. They have asked nothing but leading questions to get the MSN a sound-bite that is critical of the President. Someone needs to do a deep-dive on this to see if there was coordination between the Democrats on the committee and the either the “leaker” or his attorneys.
Schiff isn’t smart enough to ask good questions. His questions look like he had prior knowledge of the situation.
Somehow, the ICIG noted the “leaker” has a “political bias.” There must be something in the IG’s letter that casts dispersion on the credibility of the “leaker.”
That letter hasn’t been made public.
We stay low key pretty much. And know others that do the same. I believe we used to call it hiding in plain sight?
That is “his” sex today bug you never know how he may feel and identify tomorrow.
The letter was made public. 9 pages long
Its on fox website.
With the number of self-identified genders these days, it was a 1 in 34 chance...
Can’t be mooch. The whistleblower was an intelligence officer.
Pretty clear Schiff was in on the plan from the beginning. Clear Schiff coordinated with the so called whistle blower who isn’t covered by the statute and the “target” of the complaint is the POTUS who is also not subject to the statute. The entire hoax is contrived. Conveniently this hoax is timed to distract from the #FusionCollusion “investigations” which were supposed to be happening any day now.
The Treaty was ratified by the Senate on 10/18/2000.
https://www.congress.gov/treaty-document/106th-congress/16/all-info
Well, someone - some democrat or intelligence thug - handed him the information.
I want the little sh*t outed.
Not necessarily a slipup.
Although Brennan's good buddy, Susan Gordon, does seem butch.
I bet it's him/her.
I bet part of the handoff was Brennan to Susan Gordon.
I believe you’re wrong. The complaint was released, but not the IG report.
Good guess...
The New York Post's Page Six gossip section has more factual truths in it than this so-called whistleblower report. It reads like it was written by someone in the main stream media. You can tell by the lack of actual facts in it. It mirrors the majority of fake news stories coming from the press today.
This person is not a whistleblower at all then. Just another dem operative causing trouble inside the intel community.
“Maybe that’s his sex, but he’s a cowardly partisan one.”
What is the gender?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.