Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Shaping the Electoral College Part X
ArticleVBlog ^ | September 5th 2019 | Rodney Dodsworth

Posted on 09/05/2019 1:37:45 AM PDT by Jacquerie

Subtitle: July 26th – Back to Square One.

“We are,” James Wilson reminded delegates, “providing a constitution for future generations, and not merely for the peculiar circumstances of the moment.”

Colonel George Mason (VA) reviewed the modes of Executive election. None of them were entirely satisfactory. Several retained elements of popular election.

1. By the people, which he ridiculed in saying “that an act which ought to be performed by those who know the most of eminent characters, and qualifications, should be performed by those who know the least. “
2. By the State Legislatures or State Governors. Both invited unacceptable cabal and intrigue.
3. Election by Electors chosen by the people was at first agreed to, but was subsequently rejected.
4. Similarly, the Convention declined a popular election franchise limited to landowners, to freeholders, each of whom would vote for several candidates. This approach appeared plausible, but on closer inspection was liable to fatal objections. A popular election in any form would throw the appointment into the hands of the Cincinnati, a Society for the members of which Mason had great respect; but which he never wished to have a preponderating influence in the government.1
5. By the people, with proviso to not vote for a favorite State son. This was a nod to the small states over fears of large state dominance.
6. By Congressional lottery. With additional snark, Mason noticed little demand for the tickets.
7. By Congress.

After reviewing the various methods, he concluded that election by Congress as originally proposed was the best. While it was liable to objections, it was liable to fewer than any other. To minimize congressional post-election influence over the executive, he envisioned single terms.

(Excerpt) Read more at articlevblog.com ...


TOPICS: Government; History
KEYWORDS: electoralcollege; federalconvention

1 posted on 09/05/2019 1:37:45 AM PDT by Jacquerie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

Bump


2 posted on 09/05/2019 3:52:37 AM PDT by Rumplemeyer (The GOP should stand its ground - and fix Bayonets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

In before humblegunner. That was an interesting blog and I’m marking it to read the whole series later.


3 posted on 09/05/2019 4:53:30 AM PDT by outofsalt (If history teaches us anything, it's that history rarely teaches anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

bump


4 posted on 09/05/2019 5:30:42 AM PDT by foreverfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

AOC knows better...….


5 posted on 09/05/2019 6:16:02 AM PDT by wny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: outofsalt
Thanks. I wanted to arm myself before reading and blogging about Why the Electoral College is Bad for America, by George C. Edwards III, 2004.
6 posted on 09/05/2019 7:22:03 AM PDT by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson