Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Sopater
Meanwhile, back in Congress, Thomas Jefferson had produced his draft declaration, which had been reviewed and revised. On June 28 it was read and debated in Congress as a whole. More revisions were demanded and made, including the crucial decision to omit Jefferson’s attack on King George for enforcing slavery on the Colonies.

And the committee stripped out the anti-slavery provisions that Thomas Jefferson put in there, because their intent was to articulate a right to independence, not to make a commentary on the issue of slavery.

They did leave in his "all men are created equal", but they did not regard it as applying to slaves, as all 13 states were at that time slave states.

The idea of applying this verbiage to slaves, was a later year reading into the document of intentions that were not present at the time it was written and signed, and interpreting the document in this way is dishonest or ignorant.

7 posted on 08/29/2019 10:39:59 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no oither sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp

As practiced in the colonies, slavery was a British institution. While not allowed in Great Britain, it was very profitable to its merchants.

It’s why I brush off the accusations and implied guilt.


8 posted on 08/29/2019 3:18:12 PM PDT by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson