Huh? You just claimed that Q makes no money for what he does. Now you've just admitted that he/they do make money off the hoax.
Even a liberal could debate better than that.
You keep getting farther and father out. You assume that people understand what you are thinking. Even though you don’t explain your thoughts until after they answer you. Your original implication seemed to be that since people sell and buy Q material that it means that Q is being worshiped like a profit.
Now we have to jump to your new interpretation that Q is doing this to make money. But there is no copyright on anything Q. Q shirts and the likes are being sold by multiple sources and any profits are well split. Even if one of those sources is Q then they are sure having to do a lot of sharing in the profits.
I do notice that you seem to be going through a set of “talking points” that come straight from articles available in the MSM. What could that mean?