And really one of the most infuriating things about you being allowed to break the rules is that no one can offer evidence against this without also breaking the rules. There can be no defense- No Truth- No proof- because that would break the rules.
I’m not sure if it is a Pro or Anti Q story or if there is even anything to support or refute.
It basically claims on the 17th day of the month, POTUS drew attention to a baby wearing a Q onesie, and many people believed it was deliberate.
Is that not accurate?
Sounds like you need a vacation from Q and politics. You're awful wound up, defending an anonymous poster on the internet.
Seriously -- you don't even know who this person is that you're defending, but you sound like someone's threatened one of your family members.
Really -- unhook for a while. It'll do you good.