Thank you, Captain Obvious. Where've you been for the last 20 years or 30 years?
Great news! He exceeded authority but constitutionality still good. Trump can issue an EO to include it. Done deal!
Thanks W!! Now we’ll have to put up with Alfred E. Neumans long lost brother for years to come......sheesh! Ain’t the first time this has happened though.....
So the Census can ask me how many toilets I have, but cannot ask about how many citizens live in my house. I think I see how much the federal government values citizenship.
Total defiance of idiotic SC rulings is long overdue.
Roberts is a sham. He needs to bow out, step down, and let President Trump pick his replacement for the good of our nation and the free world.
Roberts is a sham. He needs to bow out, step down, and let President Trump pick his replacement for the good of our nation and the free world.
Ok then, time to start the investigation into Roberts adoption of his two Irish children and lets get that issue cleared up once and for all. He is being blackmailed for something.
Are illegals included in the count for Congressional representatives?
Oh come on now, John Roberts has proven his disdain for all Republicans, starting with his Obamacare vote.
To all those who told me I was nuts about Roberts, I will await your apologies.
The fun part will be when President Trump appoints at least two more conservative judges. If it’s this year and next it would be even better.
Roberts will be noted in history in a similar fashion as Chief Justice Roger B. Taney who ruled against Dred Scott.
bump
Is Roberts being blackmailed?
https://bigleaguepolitics.com/brennan-and-clapper-accused-of-hacking-john-roberts-to-blackmail-him/
https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/news/a36019/the-true-story/
https://spookdblog.blogspot.com/2018/11/chief-justice-roberts-blackmailed.html
NY TIMES INVESTIGATES ADOPTION RECORDS OF SUPREME COURT NOMINEE’S CHILDREN
Drudge Report ^ | August 3, 2005 | Matt Drudge
Posted on 8/4/2005, 11:48:41 AM by kennedy
XXXXX DRUDGE REPORT XXXXX THU AUG 04, 2005 11:35:09 ET XXXXX
NY TIMES INVESTIGATES ADOPTION RECORDS OF SUPREME COURT NOMINEE’S CHILDREN
**Exclusive**
The DRUDGE REPORT has uncovered a plot in the NEW YORK TIMES’ newsroom to look into the adoption of the children of Supreme Court Nominee John G. Roberts.
The TIMES has investigative reporter Glen Justice hot on the case to investigate adoption records of Judge Roberts’ two young children, Josie age 5 and Jack age 4, a top source reveals.
Judge Roberts and his wife Jane adopted the children when they each were infants.
Both children were adopted from Latin America.
A TIMES insider claims the look into the adoptions are part of the paper’s “standard background check.”
Roberts’ young son Jack delighted millions of Americans during his father’s Supreme Court nomination announcement ceremony when he wouldn’t stop dancing while the President and his father spoke to a national television audience.
Previously the WASHINGTON POST Style section had published a story criticizing the outfits Josie’s and Jack’s mother had them wear at the announcement ceremony.
One top Washington official with knowledge of the NEW YORK TIMES’ plans declared: “Trying to pry into the lives of the Roberts’ family like this is despicable. Children’s lives should be off limits. The TIMES is putting politics over fundamental decency.”
One top Republican official when told of the situation was incredulous. “This can’t possibly be true?”
Developing...
https://the-fringe.com/thread-audio_proof_john_roberts_was_blackmailed_into_changing_his_vote_on_obamacare
Trump always gets revenge...
I wonder what this will cause him to do?
Your pal Dougherty is full of shit.
I have no doubt that the judges on almost all courts have two primary topics of casual conversation: gossip about judges and lawyers; and gossip and comments about politics. At least that is what the judges whom I have known have told me.
It was actually the gerrymander case that showed very clearly there are “GOP” and “DEM” justices. The vote went 5-4 exactly by party. The GOP justices in classic Republican form chose to leave the political question to the marketplace of ideas in the states. The DEM justices wanted to impose a central/federal standard for drawing Congressional districts.
Roberts is what rinos call conservative....I feel dirty having voted for both Bushes!!!