Posted on 06/21/2019 12:12:49 PM PDT by JackCrane
Edited on 06/21/2019 12:48:29 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
Fake News headlines
A. It was a planned piece of deception from the get go. Everyone played their roles very well, especially Potus who is a seasoned actor.
B. The deception is wreaking untold havoc in Iran. Now their military will be on GQ status for weeks not knowing what to expect and that creates demoralization and discontent.
C. Trump can now negotiate with the factions in Iran who value what was done and let them convince the rest.
D. It’s totally dishonest to say Iran would have been blown off the map, the “threat” was of a limited tactical strike.
Why do these people have to spew such BS?
Dear Iran.....What do you mean Our President is sending mixed signals.
Dear Iran....Pay attention. Bolton is doing double shots.
Dear Iran....You think you're in the poorhouse now?? You ain't seen nothing.
Mind your tone.
Starting military action now would change the entire election dynamic, and we might get stuck with one of the commie-kids the Democrats are running.
China is a major purchaser of Iranian oil.
We are in trade talks with China.
Iran is asking for a beat down.
It looks like Trump has both China and Iran over a barrel.
Why?
To spare the feelings of parasites?
That’s what I thought! LOL!
You mean, “Tone your mind.” A mind is a terrible thing to let go, like your waist. Keep it toned. Otherwise you’ll end up a posting bot for a lame-ass blog.
Maybe, give a warning that location "X" is going to be hit at "Y" time and date and then do it. Thus, if anyone dies it will be on Iranian hands. It would be really nice if the location was in a place where the important and not important people had to drive by it weekly.
Followed by...
It was not clear whether Mr. Trump simply changed his mind on the strikes or whether the administration altered course because of logistics or strategy. It was also not clear whether the attacks might still go forward.
M'kayyy.
Now you are just getting mean and ugly. Stop it already, there are better ways of discouraging blog pimping.
Anyone listen to that shi* head Kilmeade on Fox and Friends today goading the president. Essentially calling him a coward.
This would have been a Syria hit and nothing substantial. Trump taking out their oil refineries is the end game for the Iranians, it would finish off their economy.
We needn’t get into another land war in Asia, we simply hit them where it does the most damage economically. We will be hit back and should be prepared.
If the economic sanctions can bring about regime change we should continue down their route. The CIA it seems doesn’t know they are supposed to work for the USA and not themselves may or may not be useful in a regime change and at this point quite honestly could Trump believe anything they tell him? They have been wrong so many times in the past and never held accountable for their long list of screw ups.
Perhaps turning the Saudi’s loose pushing for regime change and spreading the $$$ around with continued sanctions would be better in the long run. However, that being said if they hit a US target and our people are hurt or killed, their refineries are flames and their navy sits at the bottom of the Gulf.
there are better ways of discouraging blog pimping.
The title massively overstates the case.
If the report is true that Trump was told that casualties would be 150 people, there is NO WAY IN HELL a military strike of that magnititude would “wipe Iran off the map”.
Some folks just want to see us in another way and will say anything to spike up the fever for it.
We should start recognizing who among our “friends” are selling the drum beats.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.