Posted on 06/20/2019 10:59:25 AM PDT by RArtfulogerDodger
Vaccines are not traffic lights: new explosive CA lawsuit By popular request, I am re-sending this important email to my subscribers. At the very top of this email you will now see "Here's the link to share this email... Click here." That is the web version of this email. You can use that link to share with others to get the word out. As I work with an IT team to get my NoMoreFakeNews blog back up and running on a new hosting provider (as a result of WordPress de-platforming me without specific reason and without forewarning), please spread the above link far and wide. And, be sure to check out Lawyer Richard Jaffe's blog; it is a must follow.
Also, if you are reading the web version of this article and would like to subscribe to my email list, then go to NoMoreFakeNews.com and sign up in the upper left corner. You'll get articles in your inbox. Thank you for your support.
Let me boil this down.
ONE: California MD writes exemptions from vaccines for children who are his patients.
TWO: The city attorney for San Francisco issues an illegal subpoena to the MD, demanding to see all the medical records (including genetic information) of these patients. Obviously, the city attorney plans to use this medical information as a way to punish the MD for writing "unnecessary exemptions."
THREE: The MD obtains a lawyer and sues the city attorney of San Francisco.
Attorney Richard Jaffe is representing Kenneth Stoller, MD, who is under the gun from the San Francisco City Attorney, Dennis Herrera. Here are explosive quotes from Mr. Jaffe's press release:
"June 4, 2019: Today, Dr. Kenneth Stoller filed a lawsuit against the San Francisco City Attorney Dennis Herrera for abuse of power and abuse of process due to the City Attorney's illegal attempt to obtain the medical records and genetic information of Dr. Stoller's vaccine exemption patients."
"The City Attorney's subpoena is illegal under state and federal law and represents an attempt to circumvent federal and state constitutional privacy and other protective laws that prevent 'government snooping' regarding protected genetic information. There are currently no protections in place that would prevent the city attorney from sharing patient records with other state agencies or departments or to allow for the triangulation of medical and genetic data."
"'The City Attorney and other state officials are essentially suggesting politicians should practice medicine without a license,' said Dr. Stoller's attorney Richard Jaffe...."
"The law suit links the City Attorney's subpoena for medical records to a politically-motivated action designed to support proposed legislation SB 276, authored by State Senator Richard Pan. SB 276 would remove medical vaccine exemption decision making from physicians and place it in the hands of state or local public health officials. Under this bill, an important medical decision would be made by state or local government employees who have never met or spoken to the patient or family."
"The Stoller lawsuit alleges that City Attorney's attempt to get the medical records of Dr. Stoller's patients is arbitrary, given that recent measles outbreaks did not originate in bulk from unvaccinated school age children. Of the 38 reported measles cases reported in the San Francisco Bay area so far in 2019, 28 were in adults who contracted the disease while traveling abroad. Of the 10 children, it is likely that a significant percentage may have contracted measles symptoms from the vaccine, or got it despite being vaccinated..."
Note: Every time I write an article like this, people ask what they can do to help. For starters, send this piece out all over the world and get people to contact San Francisco city government and demand justice in the lawsuit.
Understand that vaccination is not comparable to traffic lights, which are posted at intersections to prevent crashes. Vaccination is a practice that has many detractors who have presented, over the years, evidence that vaccines can and do cause great harm. During the past several years, governments and media companies have stepped up their efforts (including overt censorship) to stop rational discussion of vaccination, as if the issue is not only settled, but the persons who question vaccines are "dangers to the community."
This is always the strategy of fascists.
Their attitude is: "We want X. We demand X. To get X, the public will have to comply. So let's put out wave after wave of propaganda and silence people who oppose X. Let's say no argument against our position is possible. Let's use our subpoena power and other powers to get our way. Let's say that X is wonderful and helps people. Let's say we're kind and good. Let's say whatever we need to say, and do whatever we need to do, to SHUT OUR OPPONENTS UP."
That last part is the key. If you think censoring free and rational discussion on a vital issue is kind and good, I have condos for sale on the dark side of the moon.
If you think issuing illegal subpoenas to obtain private information of innocent persons is right and good, I have no idea why you've read this far.
Addendum: In the quotes from defense attorney Jaffe above, you saw mention of a bill pending in the California State legislature, SB 276. It would establish politicians/bureaucrats as the arbiters in deciding whether to grant children exemptions from vaccines. The implication? At the whim and fancy of these pols, the private medical records of every such child could be demanded, pored over, exposed, and then "disappeared" into the state bureaucracy of agencies. How do you like THAT?
Settled? Like anthropogenic climate change?
It is not settled, and opposing argument and information has been quelled by the government-medical-pharmaceutical triad for decades.
I happen to be acquainted with the scientific method (as my academic awards in the sciences attest), and with this issue, starting in 1993.
Follow the money ALWAYS - not just when it suits your position. This is fascism.
Acquaint yourself with Antoine Beauchamp vs. Louis Pasteur.
Read the material from Mike Adams (not a leftist) - who is being deplatformed on this issue.
Why is there a taxpayer-funded, semi-secret Vaccine Court to settle lawsuits for harm or death on a no-fault basis?
“... the right to be free of disease” is at best a non-Constitutional leftist-style assertion. Is that like the right to an income or to a residence?
Everything else aside, Religious Freedom IS a Right - not what you blithely asserted.
Ah yes, but ... who "in SF" would have been a member of this community since 2003? Or even lasted a week with such opinions?
At least, methinks we're in accord regarding the subject of the thread!
I agree with everything you observe, and would add that the veterinary profession has severely revised its recommended vaccination protocol for dogs and cats under the belief that they may be responsible for the rash of autoimmune diseases and some cancers over the past fifty or so years.
Astounding!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.