Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Utah judge who criticized Trump online and in court suspended
KSL-TV ^ | May 24, 2019 | Dennis Romboy

Posted on 05/24/2019 1:42:10 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

The Utah Supreme Court has suspended a city judge for making "shirty and politically charged" comments from the bench and posting "indelicate" criticism online about President Donald Trump.

Judge Michael Kwan will serve a six-month suspension without pay for repeatedly violating the Utah Code of Judicial Conduct. In his 21 years as a Taylorsville Justice Court judge, the Judicial Conduct Commission has issued Kwan two letters of education and the Supreme Court has publicly reprimanded him twice for various violations.

One of those reprimands involved Kwan's "crass in-court reference to sexual conduct and a former president of the United States," according to the court. The other addressed his political activities as the head of a nonprofit organization that criticized candidates online using his name and title as a judge.

"We note that previous endeavors to help Judge Kwan correct this behavior have not been successful. And we regretfully conclude that a sanction less severe than suspension without pay will suffer the same fate as our prior attempts," Justice John Pearce wrote in the court's opinion.

Kwan admitted to the most recent violations but argued they warranted a lesser penalty because the sanction rested, in part, on an unlawful attempt to regulate his constitutionally protected speech.

The Supreme Court opinion cites judicial conduct rules that say a judge shall not engage in political activity that is inconsistent with the independence, integrity or impartiality of the court.

During an exchange with a defendant during a January 2017 hearing, Kwan launched into a commentary about Trump's immigration and tax policies. Apparently behind in his fine payments, the defendant told Kwan he would pay after he received his tax return.

Kwan questioned whether the defendant would get any money back.

"I pray and cross my fingers," the man said.

Kwan replied, "OK. Prayer might be the answer. ‘Cause he just signed an order to start building the wall and he has no money to do that, and so if you think you are going to get taxes back this year, uh-yeah, maybe, maybe not. But don’t worry, there is a tax cut for the wealthy so if you make over $500,000 you’re getting a tax cut. You’re right there, right? Pretty close? All right, so do you have a plan? Other than just get the tax cut and pay it off?"

Kwan, according to the Supreme Court opinion, contends that the comment was intended to be funny, not rude.

"It is an immutable and universal rule that judges are not as funny as they think they are. If someone laughs at a judge’s joke, there is a decent chance that the laughter was dictated by the courtroom’s power dynamic and not by a genuine belief that the joke was funny," Pearce wrote.

In 2016 and early 2017, Kwan repeatedly posted comments and shared articles on Facebook and LinkedIn about Trump.

"With respect to Donald Trump, Judge Kwan’s postings were laden with blunt, and sometimes indelicate, criticism," Pearce wrote.

Kwan posted a Washington Post article titled, “Ghazala Khan: Trump criticized my silence. He knows nothing about true sacrifice," in July 2016. Above the article’s headline, he added, “Checkmate.”

In November 2016, three days after the presidential election, "Judge Kwan remarked, 'Think I'll go to the shelter to adopt a cat before the President-Elect grabs them all …," the court's opinion states.

On the day Trump was inaugurated in January 2017, Kwan posted, “Welcome to governing. Will you dig your heels in and spend the next four years undermining our country’s reputation and standing in the world? … Will you continue to demonstrate your inability to govern and political incompetence?"

In February 2017, Kwan wrote, “Welcome to the beginning of the fascist takeover," and "We need to … be diligent in questioning Congressional Republicans if they are going to be the American Reichstag and refuse to stand up for the Constitution, refuse to uphold their oath of office and enable the tyrants to consolidate their power."

"Again, these are illustrative examples — not a comprehensive recitation — of the comments and articles shared online by Judge Kwan that referenced Donald Trump and a range of other topics between mid-2016 and early 2017," Pearce wrote.

The court found that Kwan's postings gave the appearance that he didn't believe the judicial conduct rules applied to him.

Pearce wrote that the primary concern is not that Kwan voiced his views on political issues through his criticism of Trump. "Far more importantly, Judge Kwan has implicitly used the esteem associated with his judicial office as a platform from which to criticize a candidate for elected office," he wrote.

The sanction imposed on Kwan also stems from his treatment of his clerk after he learned an administrative staff member was promoted without his involvement.

Kwan confronted the clerk in an "angry" and "screaming" manner, according to court documents. A short time later, he wrote a notice of disciplinary action, threatened to put her on unpaid suspension pending termination and directed her to be escorted from the building.

Recipients of Kwan's email understood it to be a judicial order in part because the email included a signature block indicating it as such. Kwan argued the signature block was unintentional but the Judicial Conduct Commission did not find that claim credible.

Every time a judicial officer engages in misconduct, he or she spends the goodwill of the judiciary as a whole, Pearce wrote, adding "Here, we readily conclude that Judge Kwan has been spending our goodwill."


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Local News; Politics
KEYWORDS: judiciary; utah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 05/24/2019 1:42:10 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

shirty?


2 posted on 05/24/2019 1:43:59 PM PDT by sparklite2 (Don't mind me. I'm just a contrarian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“Shirty?”

Don’t they mean, “shi++y?”


3 posted on 05/24/2019 1:44:04 PM PDT by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Very dignified and measured approach by the Utah Supreme Court to what appears to be an out-of-control attitude wearing a robe.

Would have been much more satisfactory had the ruling body gone right to "fire his butt" mode and skipped the niceties.

4 posted on 05/24/2019 1:46:08 PM PDT by Bernard (We will stop calling you fake news when you stop being fake news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: sparklite2

That’s how mormons say shitty.


6 posted on 05/24/2019 1:47:18 PM PDT by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sparklite2

Is that a euphemistic respelling?


7 posted on 05/24/2019 1:48:16 PM PDT by arthurus (e5b)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

What? He’s a pop singer in his spare time?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Kwan

Not quite the Everly Brothers, but a good amateur rendition:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHs2dMRRQ_Y


8 posted on 05/24/2019 1:50:41 PM PDT by Zhang Fei (My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Bet you he didn’t come to Utah with Brigham Young! Doncha just love diversity!


9 posted on 05/24/2019 1:51:06 PM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

May be a Mormon thing. After all,
they do spell macaroni as moroni.


10 posted on 05/24/2019 1:51:16 PM PDT by sparklite2 (Don't mind me. I'm just a contrarian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sparklite2
> shirty? <

I think it has something to do with wearing inappropriate shirts, like the one below.


11 posted on 05/24/2019 1:55:18 PM PDT by Leaning Right (I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“Judges are not as funny as they think they are”

True that!


12 posted on 05/24/2019 1:57:25 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

In six months, he’ll be baaaaack.


13 posted on 05/24/2019 1:58:27 PM PDT by bgill (when you badmouth women, you are badmouthing your mama and the good women on FR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Another fool that thinks his 1st Amendment rights supersede the work environment.

Couldn’t find a “will judge for food” meme.


14 posted on 05/24/2019 2:00:22 PM PDT by Rinnwald
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

No, shirty! It means:

“Shirty definition is - angry, irritated. How to use shirty in a sentence”


15 posted on 05/24/2019 2:05:42 PM PDT by Pikachu_Dad ("the media are selling you a line of soap)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Unfortunately it took multiple instances of such unprofessional conduct to get him a suspension. He should have been permanently fired long before that, he is unfit to be a judge. The judiciary does an extremely poor job of policing its own and it takes an extreme case such as this to draw a rebuke. Judges have been put on a pedestal in this country and as such are almost unaccountable which results in their feeling that their opinions are above reproach. It’s attitudes like this that result in minor federal judges thinking they have the right to override the decisions of the President and so far we’ve allowed them to get away with it.


16 posted on 05/24/2019 2:06:23 PM PDT by GaryCrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

That is definitely a shirty shirt.


17 posted on 05/24/2019 2:07:07 PM PDT by sparklite2 (Don't mind me. I'm just a contrarian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
WITHOUT PAY!! That's a FIRST!

WTF is "shirty'? Sounds REALLY bad!

18 posted on 05/24/2019 2:08:49 PM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy

Synonyms & Antonyms for shirty
Synonyms

angered, angry, apoplectic, ballistic, cheesed off [chiefly British], choleric, enraged, foaming, fuming, furious, hopping, horn-mad, hot, incensed, indignant, inflamed (also enflamed), infuriate, infuriated, irate, ireful, livid, mad, outraged, rabid, rankled, riled, riley, roiled, sore, steamed up, steaming, teed off, ticked, wrathful, wroth!

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/shirty


19 posted on 05/24/2019 2:17:07 PM PDT by Grampa Dave (Make Liberals Cry Again by continuing to Make America Great Again! Reelect President Trump in 2020!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

He ought to be removed from the bench


20 posted on 05/24/2019 2:19:46 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson