No one caught this yet in Mueller's report. Proof of Bias.

Time, WikiLeaks, CNN ^ | 18 Apr 2018 | For-Q-Clinton

[for-q-clinton]

At the beginning of Mueller's report I see he really wanted to and nail trump but couldn't so he would at least give false impressions.

Mueller says "Around the same time" as if Trump asked for Russian help and THEN WikiLeaks gave up the info.

Well Mueller KNOWS exact time and date each of these occurred. But he didn't put that in here instead he used weasel language of "around the same time". No it wasn't around the same time. In fact, WikiLeaks actually released the info in March WikiLeaks).

And then on 13 June we knew WikiLeaks was going to release more emails Time Article'

Then the release Mueller uses is the one on 22 July Washington Post Article).

Trump joked about Russia helping the US press on 26 July--AFTER WikiLeaks gave up their Hillary emails. Politico Article

They aren't related as Mueller is trying to imply--Trump didn't ask for them and then WikiLeaks gave them. Instead Trump joked about it AFTER wikiLeaks dumped the emails. And made fun of the American Press.

[for-q-clinton]

I didn't post this on a blog because I didn't want Humblegunner complaining I'm trying to pimp a blog. But I do hate that I have to put this in bloggers. This is a pretty big point most everyone has missed. I bet you hear about it in a day or two. Maybe Tucker Carlson will be smart enough to catch this.

[FreedBird]

Mueller had to keep his Anti-Trump people happy who were getting paid big bucks to play this political game.

[for-q-clinton]

Oh and the report was a flat out lie when it said it FIRST released Hillary’s emails in July. They were first released in March.

[aynrandfreak]

Good eye!

[Mr. K]

You can post your own blog IF you also copy it here.

Blog pimping is only when you post a snippet here, and force freepers to go to your site for the rest.

Then you incur the wrath of HG.

[wardamneagle]

Mueller the hack....plain and simple.

[TribalPrincess2U]

Did you see this headline in red on Drudge? I’m thru with that ahole!

‘This is the End of My Presidency. I’m F*cked’: Trump despaired after Mueller appointment...

[chief lee runamok]

Also missing: the emails were, in fact, genuine, and actual proof of hillary’s various misdeeds and corruption.

[maggief]

For the timeline:

Murder of Seth Rich
Date: July 10, 2016

[From The Deer Stand]

The question remains: why isn’t Hillary being investigated for crimes involving collusion with Russia, among other things? And with her, Obama, Valerie, Huma, and a bunch of others? Democrats have proven how phony they are by ignoring the real culprits.

[marajade]

I feel they might be.

[altura]

Humblegunner can be a real pain about this. I would ignore him.

[Responsibility2nd]

I read that comment.

Clearly the president was (correctly) concerned about what the damage a Special Investigator would do to his agenda.

Trump knew then (as we all know now) that there was no collusion - therefore nothing to worry about.

But he was rightly pissed at Sessions for recusing himself and allowing Rosenweasel to appoint Herr Mueller.

Trump was right. He was f*cked. By his own people.

[KSCITYBOY]

btt

[edwinland]

Well spotted. And here's more proof of the very same bias. IN the indictment of the supposed Russian hackers, we find:

The Conspirators spearphished individuals affiliated with the Clinton Campaign throughout the summer of 2016. For example, on or about July 27, 2016, the Conspirators attempted after hours to spearphish for the first time email accounts at a domain hosted by a thirdparty provider and used by Clinton’s personal office.

https://int.nyt.com/data/documenthelper/80-netyksho-et-al-indictment/ba0521c1eef869deecbe/optimized/full.pdf?action=click&module=Intentional&pgtype=Article

The New York Time spun that sentence into the following headline:

Trump Invited the Russians to Hack Clinton. Were They Listening?

Other left wing outlets cite that as evidence of collusion.

So ask yourself this question: when has a prosecutor ever gone out of their way to note that a criminal they are charging committed a crime "for the first time". Imagine "On Jan 1, the shoplifter, for the first time, attempted to steal several items from Walmart."

They were clearly trying to create exactly the sort of negative inference you discovered, despite the fact that even according to their own indictment the hackers were trying to hack several "individuals affiliated with the Clinton Campaign throughout the summer of 2016." Did they really need Trump to give them the idea of hacking Hillary??

I'm betting that:

1. "on or about July 27, 2016" turns out to be July 26 or before"

2. It wasn't the first time they tried to hack Hilalry's office at all.

[for-q-clinton]

Thanks. I’d like to see Hannity or Rush pick this up.

[Responsibility2nd]

And you’re right. Drudge is an a$$ hole. He posted that crap from Mediaite.

Left wing propaganda site.

[Innovative]

Trump was just kidding, making a joke.

[neverevergiveup]

Anyone who says they didn't know immediately that Trump was speaking sarcastically when talking about the Russians finding information on Hillary Clinton's emails etc. during the campaign is either less intelligent than petrified bat guano, or is lying.

This is beyond ridiculous, and the fact that this inane bs is even mentioned in that report is just more evidence that Washington and the government in-crowd are truly amongst the least talented but most nefarious and unethical people in America from sea to shining sea. There is bread mold that has more ability and credibility than many who hold government titles. It is beyond sad. Truly.

[isthisnickcool]

Drudge sucks