Jeanine Pirro’s Right – Sharia Law Incompatible With U.S. Constitution

Flopping Aces ^ | 03-20-19 | Daniel John Sobieski

[Starman417]

Sharia Law may become the third rail of America politics if one is to judge by the suspension/cancellation for at least one episode of Judge Jeanine’s weekend Fox News show “Justice with Judge Jeanine. A cowardly Fox News has extended the protective canopy of political correctness apparently barring its hosts from asking the tough and obvious questions about a doctrine few non-Muslims are aware of and few Americans understand.

As Stephen Battaglio of the Los Angeles Times reports:

…the switch appears to be related to Pirro’s March 9 comment about Rep. Ilhan Omar ( D-Minn.), who wears a hijab, a traditional head covering worn by Muslim women.“Is her adherence to this Islamic doctrine indicative of her adherence to Sharia law, which in itself is antithetical to the United States Constitution?” Pirro said in the scripted opening of her March 9 program that dealt with Omar, a popular target of conservative pundits since she entered Congress.  (snip)Fox News, which typically stands by its hosts when they make controversial statements, issued a public rebuke of Pirro over the comments about Omar.“We strongly condemn Jeanine Pirro's comments about Rep. Ilhan Omar,” Fox News said in a statement. “They do not reflect those of the network…

A question that deserves to be asked and answered. Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich has in the past observed that those who follow Sharia law can’t also be loyal to the U.S., Constitution and the Western values it represents and either shouldn’t be allowed to enter the U.S. or should be deported from it, much less serve in its legislative assemblies. This didn’t sit well with President Barack Hussein Obama. As the Daily Caller reports:

On Friday, Barack Obama called Newt Gingrich’s plan to deport sharia-adhering Muslims in America “repugnant and an affront to everything that we stand for as Americans.”

In the aftermath of the terrorist attack in Nice, France, Gingrich said, “We should, frankly, test every person here who is of a Muslim background, and if they believe in Sharia, they should be deported. Sharia is incompatible with Western civilization.”

Gingrich is right. Everything we stand for as Americans, free speech, freedom of religion, equal rights for women, are enshrined in the U.S. Constitution, the ultimate protector of our rights and Western values Sharia law is incompatible with our values and our democracy. So says Syrian Islamic scholar Abd Al-Karim Bakkar who said in 2009 that democracy and Islam are like matter and anti-matter in physics:

Democracy runs counter to Islam on several issues….

In democracy, legislation is the prerogative of the people. It is the people who draw up the constitution, and they have the authority to amend it as well. On this issue we differ.

Agreeing with Gingrich is former rival presidential candidate Dr. Ben Carson. Speaking on NBC’s Meet The Press during the primary campaign, Dr. Ben Carson was asked if a President’s religious beliefs mattered. He said they did, and, when pressed on the issue, said no Muslim should be President of the United States (insert Obama joke here) and that in fact Islam is in conflict with the U.S. Constitution:

[patriot torch]

Europe ignored sharia creep to it’s own peril.

[patriot torch]

Quote~”BTW, when did it become unacceptable to speak out against anti-semitism?”
______________________________________________________________

I think it can all be summed up with the following verse:

Luke 21:17
And ye shall be hated of all men for my name’s sake.

[I want the USA back]

Obviously fox news has gone over to the pro-muzzy left. She is absolutely right.

*slam is 100% incompatible with the US Constitution.

[fuzzylogic]

It’s surprising that this is any kind of revelation at this point.

The media cling to “Islamophobia” as though it’s a real thing. People have had enough of the BS.

Sharia Law:
- Death for apostates
- Death for adultery
- Death for gays
- Non-Muslim women can be taken as sex slaves
- FGM
- No music
- No art
- No alcohol
- ...the list goes on
- AND THE GOAL IS SHARIA, YOU CAN’T SEPARATE ISLAM FROM SHARIA

Islam means “submission” or “to submit”, that is what it requires at every level wherever it exists and it WILL NOT COMPROMISE.

How is this confusing? How can this coexist with anything? Letting it grow is nothing more than cultural suicide, how is it not?

Until our politicians understand this we’ll see more Christchurch like incidents. MAYBE they DO understand and are hoping for mosque shootings, all so they can justify disarming the population as a step toward their other goals. I suppose it could be part of the Islamic takeover plan too; spread far and wide, be abrasive and violent to the natives, then go Jihad when mosque shootings happen - where the authorities are defending them.

Either way, pretending that Islam is anything but a problem denies sanity. I don’t understand why this isn’t obvious to everyone.

[the OlLine Rebel]

The fact that Islam requires the “call to prayer” literally PUBLICLY and that everyone has to stop what they’re doing 5x a day definitely makes it incompatible with regular western life.

I prefer the call to post, personally.

[the_daug]

Why Carson believes Muslims need to decide between their faith and the Constitution — and Christians don’t

[Aevery_Freeman]

OMG! Thanks for that.

[GreatRoad]

We’re done with Fox. Already OANN full time.

[YogicCowboy]

I learned it in ninth grade history at a private Christian school - in 1971.

The teacher simply spent a few minutes summarizing over 1,300 years of Islam, emphasizing the Barbary Pirates, and then moved on.

I never forgot it. I became deeply disturbed when clergy started speaking glowingly about our fellow believers in God and morality in the 1980s.