Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What if I told you that we have at least 10,000 years of power available to us (Nuclear Waste)
Twitter Mark Schneider ^ | 03/04/19 | Mark Schneider

Posted on 03/04/2019 1:26:10 PM PST by yesthatjallen

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last
Discuss.
1 posted on 03/04/2019 1:26:10 PM PST by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Breeder reactors.
Build them.
Now.........................


2 posted on 03/04/2019 1:29:51 PM PST by Red Badger (We are headed for a Civil War. It won't be nice like the last one....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Follow the money. Preparing new fuel earns somebody a fee for the processing; storing the “spent” fuel earns someone a storage fee. IIUC, France reprocesses its spent fuel for reuse. If the worthless French can do it, why can’t we?


3 posted on 03/04/2019 1:30:19 PM PST by JimRed ( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Build the Wall Faster! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

With the rate at which they’ll selling electric cars, I think they will eventually have NO CHOICE but to do this..

I sure wish Dr. Bill Wattenburg were still alive to chime in on this.

I feel certain he would confirm everything that guy wrote.


4 posted on 03/04/2019 1:31:21 PM PST by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

The Earth is ending in 12 years.


5 posted on 03/04/2019 1:32:15 PM PST by gubamyster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen; Army Air Corps
Four Words.

Thorium Molten Salt Reactors.

6 posted on 03/04/2019 1:32:27 PM PST by KC_Lion (If you want on First Lady Melania's, Ivanka Trump's or Sarah Palin's Ping Lists, just let me know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

We have been blending old nuclear weapons into our power plants for decades.


7 posted on 03/04/2019 1:32:56 PM PST by TexasGator (Z1z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen
There's a better solution: the molten salt reactor (MSR). Fueled by nuclear material dissolved in molten fluoride salts (essentially a liquid nuclear fuel--no such thing as a meltdown!), MSR's not only can consume all the nuclear waste, but then can use widely-available thorium-233 dissolved in fluoride salts as fuel. And there is a lot of thorium-233 our there--including possibly a lot on the Moon itself.
8 posted on 03/04/2019 1:35:30 PM PST by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's Economic Cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

I knew that reactors that ate nuclear waste were a thing that we weren’t doing because of the Democrats aversion to all things nuclear. I hadn’t thought about the North Korea angle, but yeah, if he could use what he has to provide his country with energy to power a brilliant future, that would certainly go a long way toward putting the past behind them.


9 posted on 03/04/2019 1:36:37 PM PST by BlackAdderess (Why did Bernie Sanders and Maxine Waters both vote against the Magnitsky Act?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

If there is even a hint of this getting legs the screaming of “THREE MILE ISLAND” will be begin.


10 posted on 03/04/2019 1:36:53 PM PST by stylin19a (2016 - Best.Election.Of.All.Times.Ever.In.The.History.Of.Ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

God will end the world very soon.


11 posted on 03/04/2019 1:36:58 PM PST by DungeonMaster (Believing lies gets you killed by a lion {God} in the bible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RayChuang88

That’s the one I’ve heard of, the molten salt reactor.


12 posted on 03/04/2019 1:37:31 PM PST by BlackAdderess (Why did Bernie Sanders and Maxine Waters both vote against the Magnitsky Act?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Didn’t Hillary sell it all to the Russians?


13 posted on 03/04/2019 1:39:37 PM PST by outofsalt (If history teaches us anything, it's that history rarely teaches us anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

As I recall, Jimmy Carter set this up, and was hugely applauded for it.


14 posted on 03/04/2019 1:42:04 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimRed
If the worthless French can do it, why can’t we?

Because Jimmy Carter is an anti-American asshole, and every President since has been (at best) a wimp.

15 posted on 03/04/2019 1:43:13 PM PST by NorthMountain (... the right of the peopIe to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Jane Fonda ... The China Syndrome ... 3 mile island ... melted Greenies ... freaked out ultra-left environmental wackos ... raging Millennial fear ... lack of sufficient petting puppies and warm milk ...


16 posted on 03/04/2019 1:46:42 PM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Spend a few moments to scan some info about this developement from around the world
17 posted on 03/04/2019 1:54:15 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DungeonMaster

How soon?

Be specific.


18 posted on 03/04/2019 1:57:09 PM PST by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Breeder reactors are not new and have been around since the dawn of nuclear power. The problem is the technology to take spent nuke waste/bombs to make power can also be reversed to take spent nuke waste/bombs to produce HIGHLY ENRICHED fuel for BOMBS. This is why breeder reactors have been banned by every civilian nuke agency around the planet outside the original nuke countries. Once you understand and master the enrichment cycle process needed for breeder reactors, you are on the path to unlimited nuke resources to make bombs...lots of bombs. Yes, it’s much better for the environment because you don’t have tons of spent nuke fuel all over the country (Fukushima anyone?), but the trade off is nuke arms race all across the 3rd world.


19 posted on 03/04/2019 2:00:40 PM PST by SDShack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SDShack

Then go the Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactor route. These cannot be used to produce weapons grade Uranium and Plutonium.


20 posted on 03/04/2019 2:13:48 PM PST by reg45 (Barack 0bama: Gone but not forgiven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson