Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Discuss.
1 posted on 03/04/2019 1:26:10 PM PST by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
To: yesthatjallen

Breeder reactors.
Build them.
Now.........................


2 posted on 03/04/2019 1:29:51 PM PST by Red Badger (We are headed for a Civil War. It won't be nice like the last one....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

Follow the money. Preparing new fuel earns somebody a fee for the processing; storing the “spent” fuel earns someone a storage fee. IIUC, France reprocesses its spent fuel for reuse. If the worthless French can do it, why can’t we?


3 posted on 03/04/2019 1:30:19 PM PST by JimRed ( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Build the Wall Faster! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

With the rate at which they’ll selling electric cars, I think they will eventually have NO CHOICE but to do this..

I sure wish Dr. Bill Wattenburg were still alive to chime in on this.

I feel certain he would confirm everything that guy wrote.


4 posted on 03/04/2019 1:31:21 PM PST by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

The Earth is ending in 12 years.


5 posted on 03/04/2019 1:32:15 PM PST by gubamyster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen; Army Air Corps
Four Words.

Thorium Molten Salt Reactors.

6 posted on 03/04/2019 1:32:27 PM PST by KC_Lion (If you want on First Lady Melania's, Ivanka Trump's or Sarah Palin's Ping Lists, just let me know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

We have been blending old nuclear weapons into our power plants for decades.


7 posted on 03/04/2019 1:32:56 PM PST by TexasGator (Z1z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen
There's a better solution: the molten salt reactor (MSR). Fueled by nuclear material dissolved in molten fluoride salts (essentially a liquid nuclear fuel--no such thing as a meltdown!), MSR's not only can consume all the nuclear waste, but then can use widely-available thorium-233 dissolved in fluoride salts as fuel. And there is a lot of thorium-233 our there--including possibly a lot on the Moon itself.
8 posted on 03/04/2019 1:35:30 PM PST by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's Economic Cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

I knew that reactors that ate nuclear waste were a thing that we weren’t doing because of the Democrats aversion to all things nuclear. I hadn’t thought about the North Korea angle, but yeah, if he could use what he has to provide his country with energy to power a brilliant future, that would certainly go a long way toward putting the past behind them.


9 posted on 03/04/2019 1:36:37 PM PST by BlackAdderess (Why did Bernie Sanders and Maxine Waters both vote against the Magnitsky Act?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

If there is even a hint of this getting legs the screaming of “THREE MILE ISLAND” will be begin.


10 posted on 03/04/2019 1:36:53 PM PST by stylin19a (2016 - Best.Election.Of.All.Times.Ever.In.The.History.Of.Ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

God will end the world very soon.


11 posted on 03/04/2019 1:36:58 PM PST by DungeonMaster (Believing lies gets you killed by a lion {God} in the bible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

Didn’t Hillary sell it all to the Russians?


13 posted on 03/04/2019 1:39:37 PM PST by outofsalt (If history teaches us anything, it's that history rarely teaches us anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

As I recall, Jimmy Carter set this up, and was hugely applauded for it.


14 posted on 03/04/2019 1:42:04 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

Jane Fonda ... The China Syndrome ... 3 mile island ... melted Greenies ... freaked out ultra-left environmental wackos ... raging Millennial fear ... lack of sufficient petting puppies and warm milk ...


16 posted on 03/04/2019 1:46:42 PM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

Breeder reactors are not new and have been around since the dawn of nuclear power. The problem is the technology to take spent nuke waste/bombs to make power can also be reversed to take spent nuke waste/bombs to produce HIGHLY ENRICHED fuel for BOMBS. This is why breeder reactors have been banned by every civilian nuke agency around the planet outside the original nuke countries. Once you understand and master the enrichment cycle process needed for breeder reactors, you are on the path to unlimited nuke resources to make bombs...lots of bombs. Yes, it’s much better for the environment because you don’t have tons of spent nuke fuel all over the country (Fukushima anyone?), but the trade off is nuke arms race all across the 3rd world.


19 posted on 03/04/2019 2:00:40 PM PST by SDShack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen
What if I told you that we have at least 10,000 years of power available to us (Nuclear Waste)

While the author is technically correct I would say the author is also an incompetent moron talking about something about which ramifications he obviously knows absolutely NOTHING. Pu239 is the best stuff for atomic bombs. It has the smallest critical mass of any of the bomb materials. Once you start getting loads of Pu239 produced everywhere some idiot with a towel on his head is going to steal some and blow something up.

23 posted on 03/04/2019 2:16:25 PM PST by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

EBR-1 at the Argonne National Lab in Idaho was the first reactor to make usable amounts of electricity. It did so in 1951. This ain’t new science. Between reprocessing and fast breeder reactors, there was never any need for Yucca Mountain. But. Politicians. That’s all you need to know.


24 posted on 03/04/2019 2:17:50 PM PST by rednesss (fascism is the union,marriage,merger or fusion of corporate economic power with governmental power)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

The standing wave reactor looked good for consuming depleted plutonium.

The China Syndrome was only a figment of Jane Honda’s bank account.


25 posted on 03/04/2019 2:18:02 PM PST by mountainlion (Live well for those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

Can’t we build a fast acting breeder reactor about 1,000 ft over Pyongyang?


27 posted on 03/04/2019 2:28:44 PM PST by Darteaus94025 (Can't have a Liberal without a Lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

Obama/Clinton sold all ours to the Russians.


28 posted on 03/04/2019 2:29:51 PM PST by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

Some additional material

http://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/current-and-future-generation/fast-neutron-reactors.aspx


29 posted on 03/04/2019 2:33:55 PM PST by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson