I do not. But I also do not believe that the Court issued their ruling under duress. That they were influenced to do so through Presidential pressure or out of some sort of corrupt scheme to justify some action or take retribution on one section of the country. How about you?
The salient point here is that the court is wrong. The reasons for the Supreme Court being wrong may very, but the fact that they can be wrong demonstrates that one of their rulings is not proof that something is correct.
If they were wrong about Plessy v. Ferguson, they can be wrong on all sorts of decisions. Pointing out that they are wrong is not disrespect for the institution of the Judicial branch. It is merely an acknowledgment that often times their rulings are just a matter of politics, not law.