Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: DoodleDawg
I do not. But I also do not believe that the Court issued their ruling under duress.

The salient point here is that the court is wrong. The reasons for the Supreme Court being wrong may very, but the fact that they can be wrong demonstrates that one of their rulings is not proof that something is correct.

If they were wrong about Plessy v. Ferguson, they can be wrong on all sorts of decisions. Pointing out that they are wrong is not disrespect for the institution of the Judicial branch. It is merely an acknowledgment that often times their rulings are just a matter of politics, not law.

108 posted on 02/27/2019 1:49:52 PM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp
The salient point here is that the court is wrong. The reasons for the Supreme Court being wrong may very, but the fact that they can be wrong demonstrates that one of their rulings is not proof that something is correct.

In your opinion.

Pointing out that they are wrong is not disrespect for the institution of the Judicial branch.

Claiming their decision is "victors justice" is, which is what jeffersondem and I disagreed on in the first place.

109 posted on 02/27/2019 3:14:43 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson