[Stentor]

If he does emergency funding, wouldn’t this automatically go to one of our liberal circuit courts on appeal, where it could tied up in litigation indefinitely?

An appeal of what case decision. By a party of what standing? In the face of umpteen congressional statutes authorizing state of emergency power to the President? Who's the harmed party to even bring a case?

[Lagmeister]

It would be phony but it doesn’t matter. Some judge will say Trump has an ulterior motive basis his campaign comments and order the wall stopped.

[lapsus calami]

 

 

An appeal of what case decision. By a party of what standing? In the face of umpteen congressional statutes authorizing state of emergency power to the President? Who's the harmed party to even bring a case?

 

Well - the invaders themselves. Yeah for real - there's attorneys filing lawsuits making wacky claims about "human rights" of migrants to invade us. Am guessing they're throwing mud in the hope it sticks to a radical judge that will make some kind of injunction out of thin air.

 

 

[frank ballenger]

I was replying to poster Artcore. It wasn’t my own post.

Of course you are right. There is no genuine standing but when did that stop the Dems?

A right of a President of the U S to put on freeze on foreign immigration was used by Obama, Truman, FDR and others but suddenly a liberal leaning court had to rule on Trump for being so audacious and shocking. BS.

Anything Trump announces will be within his power but his haters won’t accept that.