Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: ought-six

>>He was kicking Union ass for a year and a half before Gettysburg, which he would have won had Jackson still been around.<<

Probably true, but he also could have won it without Jackson had he listened to his “Old War Horse”. He chose not to and subsequently had to admit that he himself was responsible for the defeat. Still, Gen. Lee was one of the greatest Generals in the history of our country, in my view second only to General Washington.


47 posted on 01/17/2019 9:51:25 AM PST by fortes fortuna juvat ("What goes unsaid eventually goes unthought." VDARE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: fortes fortuna juvat

Here here on Washington.

Often dreadfully unappreciated.

Notice how Lee gets a total pass for his disadvantages, while for Washington the gigantic disadvantages are often ignored.


83 posted on 01/17/2019 2:46:00 PM PST by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Federal-run medical care is as good as state-run DMVs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: fortes fortuna juvat
Probably true, but he also could have won it without Jackson had he listened to his “Old War Horse”.

Had Jackson been in charge of his old corps, he would have taken Culp's Hill and Cemetary Hill, and the Confederates would have then dominated the position. He would have driven the men until they did it. Gettysburg was lost when Lee split Jackson's corps a month or so before the battle between Ewell and A.P. Hill - two generals who are textbook examples of the Peter Principle.

103 posted on 01/18/2019 7:08:04 AM PST by Sans-Culotte (Time to get the US out of the UN and the UN out of the US!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson