Perhaps the word "infidel" will finally enter the Congressional Record.
Posted on 12/23/2018 9:41:53 AM PST by Starman417
Catholic ping
Thought they voted for and looooved the Kennedys.
“the Knights of Columbus has taken a number of extreme positions. For example, it was reportedly one of the top contributors to California’s Proposition 8 campaign to ban same-sex marriage.”
Didn’t we already go through this, first with Joe Mccarthy in the ‘50’s and secondly, with John Kennedy in 1962?
Are’nt these interrogators the same ones saying Christianity is greatly diminished in American influence? So what are they afraid of? This line of policy would make Mao RED with envy.
Ginsburg is about to leave the planet, and Trump will appoint a Catholic woman from South Bend to replace her.
They are setting the ground to disqualify her, because she is a Catholic.
You’d think Democrats would be fans of “Pope Che”.
The Knights of Columbus is not more Catholic then the Pope. (Well, maybe not the present Pope). Perhaps the best answer to a persistent questioner is to enter the Catechism of the Roman Catholic Church into the record and stand by it. The Constitution (Article VI cl. 3) is the no religious test clause for federal office holders.
Perhaps the word "infidel" will finally enter the Congressional Record.
I guess that means that the only Impartial Judges are Atheists, but the Rats might let an Agnostic slip through once and a while just to be fair.
The Dim’s are throwing all of their old base away because they are now dedicated socialists, pro-secular humanists, and totally reject all whom accept the message of Christ. They also reject religious Jews.
Faith-filled Catholics who still vote Dimocraptic need to wake up and smell the stink of the new Socialist Democrapt party...and reject it with their votes.
Fine then. Having cut down all the protections, the Democrats cannot find shelter from the winds that will blow over the land.
I am Ok with Catholic, Protestant, Mormon, Jewish, Buddhist, Sikh, Hindu, Zoroaster, Bahai, and Asatru candidates.
I am considerably less enthusiastic about "Wiccans", the reconstructed "Druids", and members from the "Church of Bob". But I might support them.
No Muslim should be permitted in any elected or appointed Government position. Nor should anyone else who advocates for Muslims.
We are all gonna hate the new rules. But we will play by them.
; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.
How about asking her if Sharia Law or the Constitution is the supreme law in the Republic. Then again I forget about al-Taqiyya.
The first nominee who responds to these questions with a clear defense of the Freedom of Religion laid down in the Constitution will win. That defense must include a personal counterattack on these inquisitors accusing them of blatant violations of the Constitution. The government is prohibited from harassing and intimidating the practice of religion. They will fold like cheap suitcases. The secondary benefit will be the continued exodus of Catholics from the Democrat Party.
Wait until the Scouts are deemed an illegal organization.
A favorite episode.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scoutrageous
The DemonRATs attacked JFK and RFK for their Catholicism but had to give them a pass because they had so much money and influence that their Daddy had gathered for them.
Apparently they no longer have much concern about Prots, who have left judgment to others.
Hey Hirono, Harris: Maybe you should direct that question to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.