Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

COMMENTARY: Donald Trump must restore election integrity
review journal ^ | 11/17/2018 | Wayne Allyn Root

Posted on 11/18/2018 7:00:56 PM PST by bitt

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last
To: odawg

So what you are saying is the SCOTUS has overstepped its authorities? Specific constitutional issues aside, the administration of elections belong to the states.


41 posted on 11/19/2018 11:41:11 AM PST by Salvavida
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: semimojo

An M1-A3 Abrams tank will do


42 posted on 11/19/2018 12:00:14 PM PST by LeoWindhorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Wayne Allen Root advocates rule-by-decree dressed up as executive orders. No thanks. We had enough of that under the Bamster.


43 posted on 11/19/2018 3:28:22 PM PST by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvavida

“Specific constitutional issues aside, the administration of elections belong to the states.”

I don’t know what your problem is. Under the Constitution, elections belong to the states.

But have you never heard of the voting rights act of 1964? It gave the Federal courts jurisdiction over state elections. It may not specifically say that in the law but the implementation of the law requires it. And did you know every time a state redraws its voting districts, they have to get permission from the Federal Courts.

And when the voting gets questionable, the Federal Courts step in, as in Florida in 2000.

The redistricting of Pennsylvania, that gave the democrats an inside track to win in the elections, was taken to the Supreme Court and was blessed by the Supreme Court.


44 posted on 11/19/2018 4:39:50 PM PST by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: odawg

My problem is I am a constitutionalist. The voting rights act is unconstitutional, the only cases that SCOTUS should be hearing a specific issues contrary to the written ink in the Constitution.


45 posted on 11/19/2018 4:44:23 PM PST by Salvavida
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson