[Nateman]

It will be interesting to see if red tape prevents rebuilding houses in places where the line is going. It would be explained away as normal bureaucratic processing. Many conflicts in the RAT party can be easily explained if it is considered as a criminal mob.

[Gen.Blather]

Early proposals for the route placed it in the least populated areas for political as well as practical reasons. Those areas, being undeveloped or lightly developed, would therefore have less asphalt and more trees.

[Doogle]

...129 million dead trees in CA.
A BIPARTISAN BILL in CA was passed recently to give the forestry people
clear access to remove dead trees and
to get rid of debris that feeds forest fires....Moonbeam Brown vetoed it...the deaths and destruction rest at his feet

[ImJustAnotherOkie]

Burn the settlers out.

[CIB-173RDABN]

LOL - You obviously don’t live in California are even drove up the Central Valley.

Look at Google map of California. The Central Valley is almost all farmland. None of the fires are occurring in the Central Valley.

In Northern California while there are population centers most is just forest. There is nothing to gain by burning the forest down.

[mountainlion]

Cheaper land acquisition than eminent domain. This would clear a corridor for the trains then development according to Agenda 21/2030. The area could become a multi trillion dollar windfall for the government and their comrades.

[Faith65]

bkmk

[Mariner]

This is complete and utter nonsense.

The rail line does not go north of Sacramento.

The fires are in the hills. The rail line will be in the valleys.

Retarded author looking for clicks.

[Chode]

how convenient