Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: deandg99

The Larsens want to enter the wedding industry. However, the state’s Human Rights Act stipulates that if the couple creates films celebrating their Christian beliefs about marriage – that marriage is between one man and one woman – they must also create films about marriage that violate their beliefs, including films promoting same-sex marriages.


If it’s that simple, it’s unconstitutional on its face. The SCOTUS would rule 9-0 against it if it came before them. Even the Fossil knows that.


7 posted on 11/13/2018 5:50:55 AM PST by cuban leaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: cuban leaf
If it’s that simple, it’s unconstitutional on its face. The SCOTUS would rule 9-0 against it if it came before them. Even the Fossil knows that.

Don't count on that.

10 posted on 11/13/2018 5:53:50 AM PST by ealgeone (SCRIPTURE DOES NOT CHANGE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: cuban leaf

The issue here is that every state has a tribunal called a Human Rights commission, which is filled with individuals attempting to ram through leftist social thinking and institutionalize it in each state.

Until these incorrectly named institutions are disbanded and are perceived to be toxic by the US citizens the tribunals will use their powers to dismantle the country.

I suspect that they will hold onto their power until the members of these commissions perceive, as do conservatives across the country, that their safety is at risk to continue along their agenda.

15 posted on 11/13/2018 5:59:21 AM PST by Chickensoup (Never count on anyone, ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: cuban leaf

Don’t underestimate the Fascism of Kagan and Ginsburg. Remember, they did NOT think that the Colorado “Civil Rights” Commission showed animus towards Jack Philips’
beliefs.

Ginsburg was in the minority that wanted to force the Boy Scouts to accept homosexuals in 2000.


35 posted on 11/13/2018 7:27:35 AM PST by fwdude (Forget the Catechism, the RCC's real doctrine is what they allow with impunity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: cuban leaf

“If it’s that simple, it’s unconstitutional on its face. The SCOTUS would rule 9-0 against it if it came before them. Even the Fossil knows that.”

No way. There are people on that court that don’t believe its role has anything to do with the constitution. Count on it.


52 posted on 11/13/2018 3:23:35 PM PST by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: cuban leaf
The Larsens want to enter the wedding industry. However, the state’s Human Rights Act stipulates that if the couple creates films celebrating their Christian beliefs about marriage – that marriage is between one man and one woman – they must also create films about marriage that violate their beliefs, including films promoting same-sex marriages.

Not, it would not be unanimous, though it should be.

56 posted on 11/14/2018 7:50:01 PM PST by daniel1212 (Trust the risen Lord Jesus to save you as a damned and destitute sinner + be baptized + follow Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson