Professor Natasha Warikoo claims that white students "reluctantly agree with affirmative action as long as it benefits them She's displeased that students she interviewed are motivated by "self-interest" instead of social justice She claims in a new academic study that merit-based admission processes at elite universities reproduce inequality.
Harvard education professor Natasha Warikoo draws on interviews with 98 white, native-born students at Harvard, Brown University, and the University of Oxford in What Meritocracy Means to its Winners: Admissions, Race, and Inequality, published in the journal Social Sciences. White students stand in fear of being labeled a racist, but they are quick to call foul should a diversity program appear at all to hamper their own chances for advancement, Warikoo claims in that book.
During interviews Warikoo conducted between 2009 and 2011, these students were asked to sound-off on whether they felt their school had meritocratic admissions and if they supported affirmative action. Many answered the second question affirmatively and hailed the benefits of a diverse student body.
But Warikoo seems concerned with students responses. Analyzing data from these interviews years later, Warikoo points out that students approaches to diversity suggest that theyve internalized the tokenistic rhetoric of the school admissions office, even if they had disagreed with policies like athletic recruitment or legacy admissions before coming to campus. (Excerpt) Read more at campusreform.org ...
“Harvard education professor Natasha Warikoo...”
Who the hell is professor Wallaby? From a Flintstones cartoon?