Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: DoodleDawg
By authority granted by the Confiscation Acts of 1861 and 1862, the constitutionality of which was upheld by the Supreme Court in the Prize Cases (67 US 635)decision issued in 1863.

Oh yes, approve rules about people that left your party, after they've left it. The very udefinition of no representation.
584 posted on 06/26/2018 11:56:03 AM PDT by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 579 | View Replies ]


To: Svartalfiar
Oh yes, approve rules about people that left your party, after they've left it. The very udefinition of no representation.

Hey, you asked.

585 posted on 06/26/2018 12:01:41 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 584 | View Replies ]

To: Svartalfiar; DoodleDawg
Svartalfiar: "Oh yes, approve rules about people that left your party, after they've left it.
The very udefinition of no representation."

But none of that happened until long after secessionists provoked war by illegally seizing dozens of Federal properties (forts, ships, arsenals, mints, etc.), started war at Fort Sumter, formally declared war (May 6, 1861), and waged civil war, including in Union states & territories, eventually refusing to stop fighting on any terms better than Unconditional Surrender.

The US Constitution nowhere requires that people at war with the United States must keep their seats in Congress even after they walked out!!
Indeed, for such people the Constitution provides us a clear definition of the word "treason".

587 posted on 06/26/2018 12:33:06 PM PDT by BroJoeK ((a little historical perspective...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 584 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson