Posted on 06/02/2018 6:07:18 AM PDT by bitt
An FBI agent who quit his top position over the bureau’s handling of the Hillary Clinton email investigation is heading to Congress to testify. John Giacalone, who led the Clinton investigation for the first seven months, will reportedly expose former President Barack Obama and fired FBI Director James Comey for corruptly helping Clinton.
There’s a massive media blackout on this because Giacalone is expected to testify that top brass at the FBI rigged the investigative process so that Clinton could skirt charges for clear violations of the law. Exposing Comey also shines a big light on Obama, who many believe was calling the shots behind the scenes to help Clinton.
The joint investigation, which is being led by Republican Reps. Bob Goodlatte of Virginia and Trey Gowdy of South Carolina, have laid the groundwork for Congress to finally hold the failed Democratic presidential nominee accountable for breaking the law.
True Pundit wrote about Giacalone in September 2016, the first media outlet to detail why he quit the FBI over Comey’s tainted Hillary Clinton probe. From True Pundit before the presidential election in 2016:
(Excerpt) Read more at truepundit.com ...
There have been plenty of bombshells pointing to guilt. It's just that the DOJ doesn't do anything about it.
This has become one giant Charlie Brown- Lucy football game. Sigh.
Here is a 95-page federal indictment
...from 320 posted on 6/1/2018, 9:54:23 PM by Duchess47 (today's Q thread)
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4491672-Weinstein-Rico-06-01-2018-Suit.html
Notice the key words Weinstein-RICO.
Dated June 1st 2018
Plaintiffs include: Miramax film, Walt Disney Company, Disney Enterprises, 12 named others, Does 1-10, and John Does 1-50.
(and recall the EO of December 21 2017 regarding freezing of funds and assets)
Please stop with your endless shtick.
It's not that Sessions is tardy and that folks are impatient. It's that Sessions said he was recused. He has announced that he's not coming.
327 posted on 6/2/2018, 12:25:49 AM by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
Yeah, dude, shut up already with your useless crap.
Bkmrk.
Unless this former agent has spilled the beans to the IG, testifying before Congress will mean squat.
I’ll get excited when I hear the handcuffs click.
But this is encouraging.
The complaint also alleges that she sought help from the law firm of Benjamin Brafman last fall, and turned over evidence to the firm not realizing that Brafman was representing Weinstein.
“which is being led by Republican Reps. Bob Goodlatte of Virginia and Trey Gowdy of South Carolina,”
Gowdy is a bought and paid for scumbag..he is only there to hamper any investigation.
Indicted by Chief Pettifogger and Prosecutor of Ham Sandwiches, Robert Mueller.
You are aware that Concorde Catering did not exist as a company during the time in which Mueller alleges the crimes took place?
You gave Mueller 3 points for this?
_____________
Please stop with your endless shtick.
It's not that Sessions is tardy and that folks are impatient. It's that Sessions said he was recused. He has announced that he's not coming.
***************************
Get over it kids. The show begins in two or three days. Justice will be served.
Just lay back and be cool.
Nearly everyone here seems like a person who has never felt God, never seen or witnessed a near miracle, or observed pure excellence.
Hold the useless venom toward each other.
GOODNESS is at the door.
Goodness does not come in the form of a Republican Senator.
Git Gowdy outa dare!
He’s a swampy creature.
You gave Mueller 3 points for this?
That's a mistake on my part. I know that 3 companies were indicted, one has chosen to answer. Wrong Concord entity.
Thanks, I'll fix it.
In all fairness, this one should still be a part of the list scored with -3 points because while it was an indictment, it was the government indicting the proverbial ham sandwich.
Herr Mueller brought an indictment against a company that did not exist at the time he alleges the crimes took place.
Bone-headed move.
You're also forgetting about Herr Mueller's pettifoggery in the Concord case. (See: Judge rejects Mueller's request for delay in Russian troll farm case - Russian firm linked to Putin’s chef accuses special counsel of ‘pettifoggery.’)
The Mueller team proposed that both sides file briefs in the coming weeks on the issues of whether Concord has been properly served.
In a blunt response Saturday morning, Concord’s attorneys accused Mueller's team of ignoring the court’s rules and suggesting a special procedure for the Russian firm without any supporting legal authority.
“Defendant voluntarily appeared through counsel as provided for in [federal rules], and further intends to enter a plea of not guilty. Defendant has not sought a limited appearance nor has it moved to quash the summons. As such, the briefing sought by the Special Counsel’s motion is pettifoggery,” Dubelier and Seikaly wrote.
The '[federal rules]' refers to the acceptance of jurisdiction. Once a defendant sends a discovery request to the plaintiff (as Concord did) answer a summons (as Concord did) then the legal assumption is that the defendant acknowledges they have been properly served.
So, any delay on these grounds (as Mueller did) is pettifoggery. I like the Merriam-Webster definition of a pettifogger:
1 : a lawyer whose methods are petty, underhanded, or disreputable : SHYSTER
I Gowdy is in it the lefties must have gotten advance notice and rigged the game as they always do.
Check your six Giacalone.
5.56mm
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.