[E. Pluribus Unum]

Science uses the scientific method, which requires controlled experiments with reproducible results.

It is impossible to conduct controlled climate experiments, much less obtain reproducible results, therefore climate “science” is not science.

[Vigilanteman]

Liberals repeatedly use the reverse scientific method:

1. Draw your conclusions.
   
2. Cherry pick data which supports said conclusions.
   
3. If not possible to cherry pick, then just invent it.
   
4. Discard or ignore any data which suggests the conclusions are wrong.
   
5. Rinse and repeat.

[onedoug]

And if an hypothesis doesn’t ultimately tie to math and physics, there’s probably no there there.

[getitright]

good point.

[SMARTY]

Thinking of the puny human presence on this planet over the past, DOCUMENTED billions of years of earth’s existence... I have a hard time with the Liberal idea that WE affect the planet.

Not nearly enough is known for certain about how the earth came into being and has evolved over the many billions of years in it’s history, to pronounce absolutely that humans affected and may yet affect, what happens to the planet.