False.
but you’re in meltdown bc I included you in my reply.
False.
But I’m the one with problems, according to you.
True!
You're cuckoo!
Posted on 05/23/2018 6:24:50 AM PDT by davikkm
The Alternative News Media community is deeply divided at this time, and I find it extremely sad that this division has occurred due to a PsyOp from within. Most of you are familiar with the QAnon movement consisting of true Patriots, who have been led by QAnon the Pied Piper.
The YouTube community became totally fixated on the false prophet, QAnon. I cannot begin to count the number of YouTubers, who reported on each “drop” of information the fake entity revealed.
He/she/them made endless errors, such as Hillary Clinton had been arrested and was wearing an ankle monitor, and it became gospel which should not be questioned.
If one did question the gospel of Q, one was immediately attacked – this I know for a fact. It was plainly not acceptable to question Q. Follow the “plan,” do not question or doubt, and have “faith.”
(Excerpt) Read more at investmentwatchblog.com ...
“U mad, bro?”
Naw...frustrated. *sigh*
Patience is on fumes. I just want to see just ONE of the cabal arrested. Just one. They were giftwrapped McCabe, complete with criminal referral from the IG. It can’t be secret—it would leak in 10 minutes. So it hasn’t happened...yet.
That was pretty funny.
So you liked being pinged to the other poster’s sewer-mouth, but you’re in meltdown bc I included you in my reply.
But I’m the one with problems, according to you.
I’ve been holding out for the imminent arrival of “R”...the TRUE ONE. I’ve made known my adherence to “R” and have yet to be attacked for that faith. For that, I’m eternally grateful to the FReeper community.
Long live “R”! ;-)
“Sessions recused himself on all of these issues.”
When you say things like this that are blatantly false people tend to discount your opinion.
Please go back and educate yourself on EXACTLY what Sessions recused himself from and get back to me. It’s actually pretty narrow and only relates to the campaign. Here is his statement.
“Having concluded those meetings today, I have decided to recuse myself from any existing or future investigations of any matters related in any way to the campaigns for President of the United States.”
So, you see, there is ole ty of areas that he is NOT recused himself from dealing with. Words matter.
The answer is: To have RR expose himself, do more illegal acts, and take him down as well. Definitely a high stakes gambit. Regarding Q: Predicting the future is always a struggle, but what is not know is that Trump and Q have all (all) the info. This is being played out like a who done it suspense thriller. The middle has been pretty slow (government director), but it is starting to pick up the pace. Coining Spygate is important. I bet it focused grouped off the scale. The dems and their accomplices are really starting to flail. The info is being given to the public a bite at a time with a whole lot of drama. Mueller is looking more and more impotent day by day. Expect him to lash out in dying convulsions on the way out. I expect the run up to the election to be fun, but after the midterm I expect it to really get fun.
False.
but you’re in meltdown bc I included you in my reply.
False.
But I’m the one with problems, according to you.
True!
You're cuckoo!
Well look at this. I finally lost one longtime harrasser, only to acquire a new one.
Q: destabilizing people one day at a time.
Thank you very much. I'm here all week.
I'll leave you with this fine image....
When you say things like this that are blatantly false people tend to discount your opinion. Please go back and educate yourself on EXACTLY what Sessions recused himself from and get back to me. It’s actually pretty narrow and only relates to the campaign. Here is his statement. “Having concluded those meetings today, I have decided to recuse myself from any existing or future investigations of any matters related in any way to the campaigns for President of the United States.” So, you see, there is ole ty of areas that he is NOT recused himself from dealing with. Words matter.
Words do matter. Your use of the word "narrow" to describe Jeff Sessions' recusal is "blatantly" misleading. Sessions used the phrase "any matters related in any way to the campaigns..." in his letter. The phrase any matters related in any way to the campaigns is not a narrow statement. The campaign of course was against Hillary. Hillary was involved with the email matter, the Clinton Foundation matter, the Uranium One matter and of course anything related to the Clinton campaign funded dossier, such as the FISA abuse matter. All those matters are connected in someway to Hillary and the campaign.
Sessions used similar language in his January 2017 confirmation hearing.
Mr. Chairman, it was a highly contentious campaign. I, like a lot of people, made comments about the issues in that campaign. With regard to Secretary Clinton and some of the comments I made, I do believe that that could place me objectivity in question. I've given that thought.
I believe the proper thing for me to do, would be to recuse myself from any questions involving those kind of investigations that involve Secretary Clinton and that were raised during the campaign or to be otherwise connected to it.
Senator Grassley wishing to clarify this broad (not "narrow") statement asked Sessions to clarify by answering about two potential investigations. So Grassley asked about a potential Clinton Foundation investigation and a potential Clinton e-mail investigation. And Sessions' answer clearly shows what he meant by his phrasing.
GRASSLEY:
OK. I think, that's -- let me emphasize then with a follow up question. To be very clear, you intend to recuse yourself from both the Clinton e-mail investigation and any matters involving the Clinton Foundation, if there are any?
SESSIONS: Yes.
I would suggest you educate yourself better next time before you post back to me.
I lost interest too. What would the motivation be to keep up the Q BS at this point other than seeking attention? This article does list the reasons people fall into a personality cult, how we want desperately to believe, and I learned a new phrase that I totally understand; hope porn.
Q reminds me of the fake birth certificate talk.
Yeah, very true. Sadly there are huge pedophile rings. It is extremely profitable for people wanting cash for kids, and for people wanting to get evidence of powerful people having sex with kids to own them. It has been happening in politics, in globalist circles, and in Hollywood. And the Podestas are as creepy AF.
oh I’m sorry, I didn’t realize that the only thing in the world that our AG could possibly be involved in was campaign related. I had assumed that the AG position was much more broad in its charter. Thank you so much for bringing my this knowledge.
Agree. It’s also worth noting that Andrew Breitbart didn’t need Q to know that an underage sex trade existed. The same is true today. The evidence is there for anyone who wants to see it, whether or not they’ve ever heard of Q.
There was actually an excellent analysis of that whole thing, which pointed out a stream of coincidences which were too much to be coincidence.
Rosenstein was supposedly selected because he has a conflict of interest, which is why he will not be present at the debrief of congress Trump just got, but rather will be replaced there by O’Callahan. There is a rumor he was colluding before the election with one of the three letter types in the insurance plan to deal with Trump after the election. I assume he is discussed in the Strzok Page redactions, or is in some other communication that Deep State thought was secure. Which means he will be out, which will be a case where people will look back and realize Q knew something before hand.
Third in command is an acting. Ed O’Callahan is an acting, which means he is only able to serve for 210 days. That would have run out a while ago, but they had the woman who occupied that position at first stay on into Trump’s admin before she bailed, which means O’Callahn’s expiration date was moved forward and will be in a bit.
Once he is timed out, the Soliciter, who is Trump’s guy, who nobody looked at too closely during confirmation, because he was so far from succession will be the next in line to fill the role Rosenstein is filling now, and then supposedly, according to Q, Pruitt can lateral in from EPA because he already has a Senate confirmation, and he can serve 210 days himself as an acting. So at the crucial moment, the person overseeing Mueller will be Trump’s guy either way.
So by choosing Rosenstein for second in the line of succession, who they know has dirt which will force him out, and timing the service of the acting third in line of succession, they created the ability to ultimately fill the crucial position with whoever they wanted, at the very same time they gave the bad actors the impression that they had just put the fox in charge of the henhouse.
Again, you cannot know these things for sure until Rosenstein is officially taken out. But the mechanism was put there so that if Rosenstein is officially taken out, then get ready because a real show is about to begin, and it will do it with Trump’s people running the show.
I think part of the problem is people want to view Q as either their own personal intelligence briefer, or a total liar trying to trick them.
I think he is neither. He is definitely a creation of Trump. Trump tweeted a photo with the file name DoItQ.jpg. Game over. There was the Q74 fire engine when the North Korean Hostages came back. Game over. Fire engines use numbers, never a letter. He is Trump’s creation.
The question is why. I think he is a psyop, giving some good intel to get us to prepare, and some bad intel to mislead the enemy. But for that to work - the overarching theme, that there is an evil force corrupting our government, and Trump and Co are working to purge that force, must be true. Or else the bad actors would not bite on it.
Personally, I am baffled why people care to argue if he is real or not. He is opening eyes on our side to the evil out there, and I do not see him doing much that is bad.
I haven't (nor will I) take the time to count the total FR post counts this past month, but I have to assume that the Q research threads are a very high percentage. Perhaps even over half.
It's also telling that no one on the Q threads (that I noticed) have any issues with people staying awy from the Q threads or participating in other threads, but there is a group of Freepers adamant that the Q threads have no place on FR. I guess my understanding of the "free" in Free Republic is different than theirs.
What strikes me about this type of analysis is how callous and impervious it is to Mueller’s victims. Take Flynn, who really has been pushed to the point of bankruptcy. It hasn’t been a game for him. It’s been a relentless nightmare. [And while Flynn was being ruined over a trumped up charge, Clapper skated on a very serious crime of perjury. How many houses did Clapper have to sell to cover *his* legal bills??]
Then there’s the guy who’s already in prison. He’s just collateral damage, I suppose.
Mueller’s wrecking ball is still going strong. Manafort is ruined forever. Tony Podesta did worse than Manafort but he’s untouched.
There are plenty of others who have had to hire lawyers and pay huge bills. Some have been charged, some will be, and for some the financial hit will be the only penalty. It’s stunning how little concern the Q-believers have for any of these people. It’s like talking to a Leftist about abortion. You can describe the pain and suffering the little babies endure but the Leftist is unmoved; it doesn’t concern them. Mueller’s specialty is dealing stress, anxiety, financial ruin and unjust indictments. For Qers, that’s all ho-hum. They’re not the ones selling houses to survive, so who cares.
And btw, I suppose it was part of the original plan that Trump’s attorney client privilege would be destroyed. That is a grotesque, dangerous and diabolical precedent to set, but Qers be like, ‘Yawn.’ How any conservativecan take that approach is beyond me.
Part of the reason non-Q-believers don’t engage with Q-believers is that they don’t need the aggravation. Qers eschew respectful, civil discussion. They prefer ad hominem, insults, name-calling and nastiness. Look back through this thread to see ample evidence of this fact.
Once in a while I encounter a Qer whose stock in trade toward non-Q-believers isn’t attack, attack, attack. But that is the exception. Most Q-believers go ad hominem right out of the gate. What’s amazing is to see them couple that aggressive, destructive approach with the boast that few non-Q-believers will engage with them. That would be like Bill Clinton literally sending a couple to jail for protesting him, and then bragging about how few people protested him.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.